honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Yep.. that Warne and Steve Waugh are bad blokes...It might have been the company he was keeping at that time
Yep.. that Warne and Steve Waugh are bad blokes...It might have been the company he was keeping at that time
I know he was concussed but lots of people thought that was a front as he was having a wretched tour, soon became obvious it wasn't.Lol, he was concussed. I know batsmen have helmets, but ask Justin Langer and Shivnarine Chanderpaul whether their helmets were any good when they've copped serious blows.
Allowing Gambhir to bat put his health seriously at risk. He should never have been allowed out to the middle, and if it was a management decision then whoever was responsible should have been sacked for endangering Gambhir further.
dude... so you think it is ok for anyone who has ever dropped a catch to be concussed?I know he was concussed but lots of people thought that was a front as he was having a wretched tour, soon became obvious it wasn't.
Having said that, no sympathy for how he got it making a complete balls up of a simple catch.
Well if he hadn't ****ed up a simple chance he wouldn't have bumped his head in the first place as he would have stood up and caught it easily.dude... so you think it is ok for anyone who has ever dropped a catch to be concussed?
I am not arguing that point.. I am just seeing it seems real harsh that you will say you have no sympathy for a guy who got concussed, just because he got it while dropping a catch.. There are far more stupid things that people do that leads them to get concussed but I don't think I will ever lose sympathy for them however daft the action causing the concussion was....Well if he hadn't ****ed up a simple chance he wouldn't have bumped his head in the first place as he would have stood up and caught it easily.
They may well be, but I was referring to youYep.. that Warne and Steve Waugh are bad blokes...
try telling that to Warney... He is quite simply the best guy to talk to among the cricketers I have met. He even told me how to bowl the flipper..They may well be, but I was referring to you
Couldn't have happened to a nicer bloke.I don't see why how he got his concussion has any relevance to the issue at hand.
Whatever then.Smacks of Anglo-centricism I'm afraid. Anyone who'd watched equal proportions of his entire career would find the idea laughable.
LolWhatever then.
To me I was watching a bloke who'd previously cried off tests in the last year or so against SA & Oz in series that (hey) I'd followed (it's ever so good, Sky) do the same thing again.
I dunno, maybe it's because I'm an unreconstructed neanderthal and all, but I like to see chaps who want it badly despite being hurt and have to be talked out of playing on for the good of their health rather than those who have to be coaxed to the crease or nets to see if they might possibly be able to continue.
Why do I get the feeling you are a troll? Every post you make is basically a dig at India. Go back to Pakpassion kid.Averages is gone below 50 now. Huge slide from 58 at one point. Not good enough player to average 50+ in tests. If he can stay fit, Gambhir would average in early 40s.
If it drops that far he'll be dropped from the team anyway.Averages is gone below 50 now. Huge slide from 58 at one point. Not good enough player to average 50+ in tests. If he can stay fit, Gambhir would average in early 40s.
But you're just speculating on both his physical condition in the lead-up to those tests, and on Gambhir's personal attitude to whether he should be playing or not. We don't know how fit he was in any of those situations- we can't even make a semi-educated guess. We don't even know whether he actually wanted to play or not. Players don't select themselves. Has there been an interview or some crucial piece of info that's gone over my head? Where did the assumption that Gambhir wasn't up for playing come from?Whatever then.
To me I was watching a bloke who'd previously cried off tests in the last year or so against SA & Oz in series that (hey) I'd followed (it's ever so good, Sky) do the same thing again.
I dunno, maybe it's because I'm an unreconstructed neanderthal and all, but I like to see chaps who want it badly despite being hurt and have to be talked out of playing on for the good of their health rather than those who have to be coaxed to the crease or nets to see if they might possibly be able to continue.
Despite what Joe said earlier both Bumble and Manjrekar said they'd seen him having a full net on the morning of the second test.But you're just speculating on both his physical condition in the lead-up to those tests, and on Gambhir's personal attitude to whether he should be playing or not. We don't know how fit he was in any of those situations- we can't even make a semi-educated guess. We don't even know whether he actually wanted to play or not. Players don't select themselves. Has there been an interview or some crucial piece of info that's gone over my head? Where did the assumption that Gambhir wasn't up for playing come from?
Also I don't like Gambhir either said:What!!!!
coming to the thread, Gambhir is a serious suspect outside off stamp, though most batsmen are, but he a bit more because of his tendency of playing far away from his body (sometimes it is quite difficult to assume exactly what shot he was playing), and definitely against the short pitched stuff...but i think, he has the ability to perform outside sub continent, but may be, not in a consistent basis...but in the sub continent, he is as good as any, very good against spinners as well...in fact, after Gavaskar, he and Sehwag are the two best openers to have come from india, can't see his averages going down to 40 though...(averages do fluctuate when one doesn't have enough weight of runs to back it up, they tend to get stable, as the career progresses, i see it somewhere in the high 40's five years from now, definitely)
His stats are impressive. But when the going gets tough, Gambhir doesn't get going.