Go Back   Cricket Web > Archived Forums > Archived Forums > World Cup 2011



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


View Poll Results: Who will win this match?
New Zealand 11 28.95%
South Africa 27 71.05%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20-03-2011, 03:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
Cricket Web Owner
 
James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 22,255
*Official* Quarter Final 3 - New Zealand v South Africa

New Zealand v South Africa
Fri Mar 25
Shere Bangla National Stadium, Mirpur
08:30 GMT | 14:30 local | 19:30 EST | 19:00 CST | 16:30 WST

New Zealand Squad

Daniel Vettori (captain), Hamish Bennett, James Franklin, Martin Guptill, Jamie How, Brendon McCullum (wicketkeeper), Nathan McCullum, Kyle Mills, Jacob Oram, Jesse Ryder, Tim Southee, Scott Styris, Ross Taylor, Kane Williamson, Luke Woodcock

South Africa Squad

Graeme Smith (captain), Hashim Amla, Johan Botha, AB de Villiers (wicketkeeper), Jean-Paul Duminy, Faf du Plessis, Imran Tahir, Colin Ingram, Jacques Kallis, Morne Morkel, Wayne Parnell, Robin Peterson, Dale Steyn, Lonwabo Tsotsobe, Morne van Wyk (wicketkeeper)
__________________
Email - james.nixon@cricketweb.net
Moderators - moderators@cricketweb.net (will go to all moderators)
Skype - nixonja@hotmail.com
Google Talk/Facebook - cricketweb@gmail.com
James is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 03:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
BeeGee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 2,727
Confidence is low, which is perfect for NZ.

I hope SA choke, but they'll probably save that for the semis.
BeeGee is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 03:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Somerset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 9,863
Apparently Bennett has been replaced by Daryl Tuffey in the XV after Bennett's injury during the Sri Lankan match: World Cup 2011: Daryl Tuffey replaces injured Hamish Bennett | Cricket News | ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 | ESPN Cricinfo
Somerset is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 04:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
straw man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: l
Posts: 4,885
We haven't played South Africa in ages, which is probably a good thing as they haven't had a chance to wipe the floor with us like every other team has in the last 12 months.

South Africa huge favourites obviously. NZ simply cannot bat first - combine our propensity to collapse with an inability to judge a par score and build towards it, and it's a recipe for disaster. We used to be good at batting second but now are not - still it's a better bet than batting first, and there's always a chance our decent bowling attack (assuming fitness) can restrict South Africa to a moderate score.
straw man is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 04:14 PM   #5 (permalink)
Englishman
 
BoyBrumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
Posts: 42,582
Have to fancy SA for it, I'm afraid. On paper at least I reckon they have the best team & squad in the tournament. We proved they can still get a little chokey chasing small targets tho.
__________________
- As featured in The Independent.

"This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers."
- Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads
BoyBrumby is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 04:29 PM   #6 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Woodster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 5,153
Think in theory this is the most straight forward outcome in the quarters. SA have shown what they're capable of, they now have a balanced attack capable of being effective on all types of pitches, and while they're batting depth is not as strong as it has been in years gone by, the top order have all shown flashes of good form and as a unit should have too much for NZ.

NZ will relish being the underdogs, but the responsibilty will fall on the shoulders of Ross Taylor, Jesse Ryder and Brendon McCullum to get a big score, just not sure they'll get enough.
__________________
http://batallday.blogspot.com/ - Cricket blog dedicated to domestic cricket.
Woodster is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 04:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
flibbertyjibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: England
Posts: 7,904
Looks on paper the easiest match to predict of all the quarters, so New Zealand are bound to cause an upset and win now.

Game could hinge on the form of the returning spinners, if one gets belted it could be costly.
flibbertyjibber is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 05:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Hurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wellington
Posts: 7,349
I will watch the game closely and root for us. Our batting is just too brittle to deserve to win this. It will take a piece of Taylor brilliance for us to score 300 and defend it.

Our only realistic chance of winning is for us to pull off some fluke catches and turn the game on its head.
__________________
Munro watch:
Auckland 47,103, 27, 269*, 59, 118
Tests 0,15
Hurricane is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 06:02 PM   #9 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Bahnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On top of a pile of money, surrounded by many beautiful women
Posts: 5,176
While I think we've got more of a chance against SA than we would've if we'd been matched with India, it would still be a staggering upset if we won. From my point of view, our best bet would be to bat first, put up something competitive (220ish), and then let Timmeh and the spinners have their way. It could happen, right? Right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeathDavisSpeed View Post
I can think of a list of Sydney Grade posters who would contribute a better average post than Bahnz.
Maow like no one can hear you maowing.
Bahnz is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 06:10 PM   #10 (permalink)
U19 Debutant
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 385
NZ bowling is far too weak. Barring a massive choke job I can't see SA losing this
Isura is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 06:19 PM   #11 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
KiWiNiNjA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In the kitchen
Posts: 9,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isura View Post
NZ bowling is far too weak


Surely you meant batting.
KiWiNiNjA is online now  
Old 20-03-2011, 06:20 PM   #12 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virat Kohli
Posts: 47,431
Would be oh so awesome if NZ won.
Jono is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 07:35 PM   #13 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
smalishah84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: dxb
Posts: 18,853
would be an upset if NZ won
__________________
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW

Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
smalishah84 is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 08:42 PM   #14 (permalink)
State Captain
 
Lostman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,916
NZ for the upset and surprising every one. Taylor and Ryder to carry the batting.
__________________
For as long as there is limited overs cricket - of ten, twenty or fifty overs - there will remain the Sri Lankan spinners' mid-innings choke
Lostman is offline  
Old 20-03-2011, 09:32 PM   #15 (permalink)
International Coach
 
tooextracool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: not far away from you
Posts: 14,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by straw man View Post
We haven't played South Africa in ages, which is probably a good thing as they haven't had a chance to wipe the floor with us like every other team has in the last 12 months.

South Africa huge favourites obviously. NZ simply cannot bat first - combine our propensity to collapse with an inability to judge a par score and build towards it, and it's a recipe for disaster. We used to be good at batting second but now are not - still it's a better bet than batting first, and there's always a chance our decent bowling attack (assuming fitness) can restrict South Africa to a moderate score.
Bat 2nd IMO. Not just because it will probably be a slow wicket but also because almost all SA choke feats have one thing in common - SA chasing a target.
__________________
Tendulkar = the most overated player EVER!!
Beckham = the most overated footballer EVER!!
Vassell = the biggest disgrace since rikki clarke!!
tooextracool is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
*Official* Match 39 - Bangladesh v South Africa James World Cup 2011 161 20-03-2011 12:49 PM
*Official* Match 34 - Ireland v South Africa James World Cup 2011 106 16-03-2011 02:47 AM
Group A - South Africa, Mexico, Uruguay, France James 2010 Football World Cup - South Africa 322 24-06-2010 05:48 AM
India v South Africa Tests James Fantasy Cricket 0 02-02-2010 05:22 PM
The best minnow basher of this decade Shri Cricket Chat 84 10-12-2009 02:04 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web