silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
And obviously it's not important do do well so you can get to the finals.
BoringWC
And please dont cite 1st round etc
I love Tendy but his record in important ODIs is ridiculously overrated
Give me a Steve Waugh innings vs SA 1999 any day over 30 knocks that mean nothing in the scheme of things
This is the kind of logic that I never understand. You pick an inning and decide that as clutch and surround your entire argument around it but at the same time reject the same position when others use it for Tendulkar.WC
And please dont cite 1st round etc
I love Tendy but his record in important ODIs is ridiculously overrated
Give me a Steve Waugh innings vs SA 1999 any day over 30 knocks that mean nothing in the scheme of things
Happens a bit too often for my liking.Yeah, seems like another round of bash Tendulkar day.
This. Don't think you can say he's not been good at WCs when he's won a player of the WC award.he certainly is. failed in the 03 finals against aus. but he took the team to the finals in the first place. won the man of the series prize that year, the only time it went to a player who didnt play for the champion side.
as for the main question, dhoni in my books is still a bit behind bevan. because i do believe WC performances are important.
edit: fixed the year
India were pretty much out of it as soon as Oz hit 300 and had Mcgrath in the side as a bowler.This. Don't think you can say he's not been good at WCs when he's won a player of the WC award.
I'm not sure if a SL player won player of the last WC, had in my head they did.
Edit: should say, I cbf going over the stats and what have you, but remember thinking when McGrath got Tendulkar out in the 03 final that any chance India had was gone, such was his importance.
Also thought that of the Aussies in that WC Andy Bichel's contributions were epic. Not saying he should have won the award, just that he played out of his skin for us.
I think your ignorance of Steve Waugh is showing. In 1987 he was a true all-rounder and took 2 for 37 from 9 overs in the final against England including the important wicket of Allan Lamb and Defreitas who had scored 17 from 10 and was looking like he might pull off a win. After Simon O'Donnell he was the most economical bowler and along with AB took the most wickets at 2. He also scored 5* from 4 balls.This is the kind of logic that I never understand. You pick an inning and decide that as clutch and surround your entire argument around it but at the same time reject the same position when others use it for Tendulkar.
If scoring in the WC Finals is all that matters then Please show me what SR ****ing Waugh has ever done in an WC final. In 3 ****ing finals he has a grand total of 18 ****ing runs, yes you heard it right Big 18 ****ing Runs in 3 WC finals where it mattered most.
Now as soon as I mention the above Statistics, you suddenly remember that your whole head was below the ****ing sand and it is time to bring that head out of the ****ing sand and shift the ****ing goal post.
Cool story, bro.SHarjah 1998, kthxbai.
I think Jayasurya won man of series in 96 world cup.This. Don't think you can say he's not been good at WCs when he's won a player of the WC award.
I'm not sure if a SL player won player of the last WC, had in my head they did.
Edit: should say, I cbf going over the stats and what have you, but remember thinking when McGrath got Tendulkar out in the 03 final that any chance India had was gone, such was his importance.
Also thought that of the Aussies in that WC Andy Bichel's contributions were epic. Not saying he should have won the award, just that he played out of his skin for us.
Really? Has that been used before or after, or was it just for the 2003 tournament?I think Jayasurya won man of series in 96 world cup.
Sachin winning man of series in 03 had nothing to do with subjective evaluation. It was based on a predetermined ranking system which assigned points based on runs scored, Wickets taken, catches etc. The whingeing is akin to the same when india got to test number one rankings. (Not at you mate)
I see you haven't got over Sachin's one man demolition of Australia in 98 champions trophy.Cool story, bro.
I'm glad you think that rankgs up there with the World Cup and Champions Trophy. kthxbai
I wouldn't really care. I'd rather see Sachin win a Test series in Australia or S.A. before he retires.A question to the Indian fans: what will be your thoughts if India go into the deep stages of the next WC and you still don't win a WC with Sachin?
i said it with tongue in cheek mate. dont like to see anyone getting banned!This.
Satyam was banned for something similar,wasn't he?