Scaly piscine
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
What would an Aussie know about quality birds?FaaipDeOiad said:I actually like ****atoos. Quality birds. Scaly does them a great disservice.
(I'll have a rest shortly honest)
What would an Aussie know about quality birds?FaaipDeOiad said:I actually like ****atoos. Quality birds. Scaly does them a great disservice.
They don't have to be a good team for you to perform in an impressive manner against them. It was his first cap, and he played well, it doesn't really matter who he was playing against. He was in everything from the time he came on, particularly when compared to (this is the good part... wait for it) the likes of Archie Thompson.luckyeddie said:Don't make yourself look a total numpty* by having a go at Marc over that one, for crying out loud - oh, too late. Never mind, perhaps no-one will notice unless someone else brings it up in gereral conversa... oh dear, sorry about that.
Leichtenstein are ranked somewhere around the level of Burton Albion reserves. Showing your class against them is not all it's cracked up to be - really.
*Numpty - Noun
a) Someone who (sometimes unwittingly) by speech or action demonstrates a lack of knowledge or misconception of a particular subject or situation to the amusement of others.
b) A good humoured admonition, a term of endearment
c) A reckless, absent minded or unwise person
d) "No. That wisnae wit she meant, ya big numpty!"
e) i.e. "Silly billy", "You big dafty"
f) "That numpty's driving with no lights on!"
That one was pretty good, actually.Scaly piscine said:What would an Aussie know about quality birds?
(I'll have a rest shortly honest)
Ah, sleep deprivation. Makes us all a bit touchy.FaaipDeOiad said:They don't have to be a good team for you to perform in an impressive manner against them. It was his first cap, and he played well, it doesn't really matter who he was playing against. He was in everything from the time he came on, particularly when compared to (this is the good part... wait for it) the likes of Archie Thompson.
If someone went on about his performance as though it made him an international star, Marc might have a point, but comparing his effort against a weak team to the efforts of other players in the same game and therefore judging that he was worthy of a run in the world cup is hardly unreasonable. I'd suggest Guus agrees, as he then went and picked him ahead of Thompson to come on in the next match.
Really, Marc's comment was only so annoying because it came in a long series of posts bagging Australia and Australian fans, which is something he's been doing consistently ever since this world cup forum opened up. Yes, we get it, England are better. Now can we enjoy watching our team? Thanks.
Still irrelevant because of it being a meaningless game against extreme tripe.FaaipDeOiad said:It was his first ever cap for Australia, you realise?
Agreed. Harry managed one dive, but the Japanes midfield dived ALL THE TIME. Eventually the ref just let us get away with a fair bit in our tackles because of their constant diving I think. Either that or he was just guessing over some of his decisions...ash chaulk said:sucked in japan u deserved to lose you wannabe olympic divers
kennedy was lively again mrrrr kennnnneeedddyyy.......................kennedy
everyone was awesum i dnt like wilkshire tho and emerton looked slow again
No, it's called having exams at the start of the World Cup.benchmark00 said:Convenient.
Apparently the ref said to Schwarzer that he erred and that God was apparently on his side, for what happened didn't affect the result.marc71178 said:I didn't see it, but heard the commentators talk about it.
They couldn't make their minds up as to if it were a foul or not, so you have to go with the refs interpretation from where he stood.