LolTests: Thorpe > Ranatunga
ODIs: Ranatunga >>> Thorpe
=
Ranatunga
Thorpe is sooooo far ahead of ranatunga in tests it's not even funny.Tests: Thorpe > Ranatunga
ODIs: Ranatunga >>> Thorpe
=
Ranatunga
That's clearly not true. Thorpe's ODI career is maybe equivalent to 1/3rd Ranatunga's career:Eh? Thorpe averaged more in ODIs and scored them far more quickly too.
Am I missing something?
I think he used to, not as much of an issue anymore, but he still isn't one for big tons.If Kohli lacked temperament in tests, he wouldn't have 14 centuries in 50 games.
Yea I think Arjuna is pretty underrated in ODIs - his SR is amazing considering the era he spanned.Arjuna had a SR of 77.9 for a career that spanned from 1980s to 1990s.Ranathunge is one of the best ODI players of the game.Doesnt make sense to compare players overall
For instance we can't compare Younis Khan and V.Kohli and ask who the better bat is.Younis is a man for crisis,lacks the same adaptability in limited overs,where Kohli is an ODI ATG,lacks temperament in Tests
Brumby, meet Viriya. None of his opinions make any real sense (current best one being that de Kock is the number 1 Test batsman in the world...Eh? Thorpe averaged more in ODIs and scored them far more quickly too.
Am I missing something?