Arachnödouche2.0
State Vice-Captain
Well, we continued picking Gill on vibes too and see what's happening. England only need to persist with Crawley.
There is some method to the madness, for a start Crawley and Duckett are very different dimensions, with one lefty and one righty, plus there aren’t tons of potential openers hammering down the door. I presume Bethell (who hasn’t opened, but effectively did in NZ on account of Crawley’s woeful series there) is next in line, then who else is there? The hype on McKinney seems to have cooled, Haines perhaps? Hit a daddy ton against some of the bowlers England might be facing in the Lions game (on a pancake, but still), Emilio Gay did quite well in that mini-series too, although with him recently turning out for Italy I’m genuinely not sure he’s eligible!Crawley is irredeemably awful. He's the worst batsman to get such a long rope and remain unquestionably first choice. He has the record of a dire NZ opener from the 99s so I'm convinced if you gave Blair Hartland 50 tests without having to worry about his spot he'd have similar numbers too. This policy of picking guys on vibes regardless of FC stats only works in the short term before they revert to mean.
Gill has a great record at every level he's played at from age group to FC cricket as well as white ball success internationally. Crawley's first class record is underwhelming as well. He's not even the best opener in his county and I doubt he'd even make a team of the season at any point in his career.Well, we continued picking Gill on vibes too and see what's happening. England only need to persist with Crawley.
iirc isn’t this objectively statistically true? worst average ever for an opener with as many runs as he has and that’s with the benefit of the pancake pitches they get at home nowCrawley is irredeemably awful. He's the worst batsman to get such a long rope and remain unquestionably first choice. He has the record of a dire NZ opener from the 99s so I'm convinced if you gave Blair Hartland 50 tests without having to worry about his spot he'd have similar numbers too. This policy of picking guys on vibes regardless of FC stats only works in the short term before they revert to mean.
It's actually because of Garner's batting.Zak is in the team because of his father, we know that.
It is, tho they weren't pancakes in early career but legitmately he is the worst opener I've seen play so much internationally regardless.iirc isn’t this objectively statistically true? worst average ever for an opener with as many runs as he has and that’s with the benefit of the pancake pitches they get at home now
They made it.Stokes calling this road a SC pitch![]()
I'll think about it when you finally stop being a bandwagoner.@Xix2565 needs to get down on both knees and suck Akashdeep's dick as an apology for mentioning his name in the same breath as Prasidh Krishna
Nah, come tf on. Australia recently's been stuck with a lot of seaming wickets after a bunch of roads before. Sounds like ****ery to me.Maybe I'm showing my bias too much but I do think Australia at least have a bit of a claim to the moral high ground with "pitch doctoring". I honestly don't think we've been guilty of ****ing with pitches to get the ideal result the team needs. Most other nations OTOH have. India aren't even that bad in that regard!
Seaming pitches don’t do Australia any favours as it hurts our battingNah, come tf on. Australia recently's been stuck with a lot of seaming wickets after a bunch of roads before. Sounds like ****ery to me.
Should make Crawley captainWell, we continued picking Gill on vibes too and see what's happening. England only need to persist with Crawley.
Almost as good as the WTC FinalWhat a great day for world cricket
They help your bowling, which matters more. Easier to get wickets and rotate players. Sure, it brings the opposition bowlers more into the game but most teams don't have Boland/Webster/Marsh level bowlers as their 3rd-6th options in such cases. And on roads it bolsters your batting unit which is used to making runs on them.Seaming pitches don’t do Australia any favours as it hurts our batting
Our bowlers are capable of getting batsmen out on roads so all it does is even things up for the opposition
Nope. I'd much prefer the kind of true to road Aussie wickets before the most recent home series we've played v SA, Eng and India. Our bowlers know how to exploit the conditions better than touring teams.They help your bowling, which matters more. Easier to get wickets and rotate players. Sure, it brings the opposition bowlers more into the game but most teams don't have Boland/Webster/Marsh level bowlers as their 3rd-6th options in such cases. And on roads it bolsters your batting unit which is used to making runs on them.
Tbh it's about time we acknowledge that pitches are made, not wished into thin air where we pretend it's all for the love of the game and no one greatly benefitd from the type of wicket being made.
Bazball only know how to play on roads so there's no chance Australia giving them roads, lets be honest.Nope. I'd much prefer the kind of true to road Aussie wickets before the most recent home series we've played v SA, Eng and India. Our bowlers know how to exploit the conditions better than touring teams.