GotSpin
Hall of Fame Member
Sobers is probably the second or third ever best batsmen. I'd have him over Tendulkar or RichardsNot in the context of that lineup though. The batting is literally loaded.
Sobers is probably the second or third ever best batsmen. I'd have him over Tendulkar or RichardsNot in the context of that lineup though. The batting is literally loaded.
3rd best surely.Sobers is probably the second or third ever best batsmen. I'd have him over Tendulkar or Richards
Foolish of me to forget. Inzi was implied though3rd best surely.
Inzy > Bradman > Sobers
No.3rd best surely.
Inzy > Bradman > Sobers
3rd best surely.
Inzy > Bradman > Sobers
Don't confuse AaronK with Faisal.Foolish of me to forget. Inzi was implied though
So true. This is such a farce. I would go on to say that Wasim is the best ODI bowler ever. But he doesn't deserve to be in an all time test XI. He would hardly make a second all time test XI let alone a first one.I will dare to blaspheme and say that Wasim Akram doesn't. His exploits in ODIs where he was a great great bowler are wrongly extended to assessment of his value as a test bowler. Even in that talk with Ian Chappell on this chosen XI, he mentions 92 world cup final when talking about Wasim
To start with check this and be surprised:
Reliance Mobile ICC Player Rankings
Those are career best ratings, an indication of how good one has been at his peak. Now consider Imran who had the 3rd greatest peak and could bat too and was a great leader. This is why some of us are totally disappointed on Wasim's selection over Imran.
True.Sobers>Imran>Akram
I mean, Sobers can make it based on his batting alone.
The World XI: Jack Hobbs, Len Hutton, Don Bradman, Sachin Tendulkar, Viv Richards, Garry Sobers, Adam Gilchrist, Malcolm Marshall, Shane Warne, Wasim Akram, Dennis LilleeSobers is probably the second or third ever best batsmen. I'd have him over Tendulkar or Richards
I can understand dropping Wasim for Imran but why would you drop Sobers for Imran. Would clearly weaken the batting significantly.The World XI: Jack Hobbs, Len Hutton, Don Bradman, Sachin Tendulkar, Viv Richards, Garry Sobers, Adam Gilchrist, Malcolm Marshall, Shane Warne, Wasim Akram, Dennis Lillee
Imran would easily be a better choice imo.
I agree that he'd be a better choice over Wasim. In fact, I'm still shocked he wasn't picked over him. In the case of Sobers, if you don't consider him to be the greatest AR (as I do), then you can pick him in the side for his batting alone. He was that good.The World XI: Jack Hobbs, Len Hutton, Don Bradman, Sachin Tendulkar, Viv Richards, Garry Sobers, Adam Gilchrist, Malcolm Marshall, Shane Warne, Wasim Akram, Dennis Lillee
Imran would easily be a better choice imo.
So trueI agree that he'd be a better choice over Wasim. In fact, I'm still shocked he wasn't picked over him. In the case of Sobers, if you don't consider him to be the greatest AR (as I do), then you can pick him in the side for his batting alone. He was that good.
LOL Bradman's voice sounds weird in that second video. BTW, the "front foot square cut" sounds like an awkward shot to play.Would like to take this back now after watching this video YouTube - Donald Bradman
Yeah in those few shots like the only thing he is missing is Tendulkar's high elbow shots and they have a different stance.
But tbf to me on this video YouTube - Don Bradman his technique looks different.
I was more inclined to say that because i wanted to see a little more in the bowling area. Plus my understanding was the Sobers was taken in as an all rounder.I can understand dropping Wasim for Imran but why would you drop Sobers for Imran. Would clearly weaken the batting significantly.
he was.. but even then, you have to consider him as a batting allrounder and at #6, I daresay that is the type of all rounder you want.I was more inclined to say that because i wanted to see a little more in the bowling area. Plus my understanding was the Sobers was taken in as an all rounder.
Its not a usual no 6 position after which you have half good batsmen or pure tail enders.. You have Gilly after that and if Akram is there then he can bat. On the basis of picking an all rounder i would go with Imran to add more options to bowling as the batting is already quite strong and doesn't become absolutely depleted with Imran replacing Sobers.he was.. but even then, you have to consider him as a batting allrounder and at #6, I daresay that is the type of all rounder you want.
I love imran. but with lillee, marshall and akram to take the new ball, I am not missing him. he can replace akram, yes. but he cant - no one can - replace sobers. sobers as a batter >>> imran as a bowler. imran the batter >= sobers the bowler. so gary brought more to the table any given day.Its not a usual no 6 position after which you have half good batsmen or pure tail enders.. You have Gilly after that and if Akram is there then he can bat. On the basis of picking an all rounder i would go with Imran to add more options to bowling as the batting is already quite strong and doesn't become absolutely depleted with Imran replacing Sobers.
I wouldn't have him in my second XI. He may make the third.how the **** did they manage to leave out hadlee from the second XI?
Well...........the difference is not that great.........I love imran. but with lillee, marshall and akram to take the new ball, I am not missing him. he can replace akram, yes. but he cant - no one can - replace sobers. sobers as a batter >>> imran as a bowler. imran the batter >= sobers the bowler. so gary brought more to the table any given day.