Haha yeah he's made that obvious for quite some time. Not a bandwagon-jumper either; he rated him extremely highly even when he'd just been dropped from the team for looking like a clown in South Africa and was putting in pretty average performances domestically.'Sehwag the most destructive after Bradman' | Cricket videos, MP3, podcasts, cricket audio at Cricinfo.com
Chappell's a SehWAG fanboy.
To borrow an aussieism, SMH.
There was always a very high chance that the readers would pick Wasim (considering that the readers picked him as the # All Rounder of all time..imagine that) but I thought the jury would have a somewhat different choice than the readers. And the All time XI bowling attack looks weaker than the second XI attack.
wasn't Imran a better alrounder than Wasim?
wow aaronk... you are a genius... how the hell did you get it right? and the masses agree with you too! you are a very special talent indeed! am absolutely jealous of your intelligence, mate!
in india SMH means this: Sindhu | Wire Stitching Machines, Lamination Machines, Paper Cutting Machines, Dab Press Machines
Haha over here it means Sydney Morning Herald. The member 'aussie' uses it to say "shaking my head" though.
Distinctly noticeable modern bias which, although expected, was still disappointing.
Ankit quoted below answers your question here.
Yeah with only one all rounder whose bowling is quite ordinary (by all time standards) only one all rounder makes the team somewhat weaker than it should have been.
Thats the case, I was quite disappointed cause I wanted to pick Hadlee.
Ye basically. That is argument i always give when picking the AUS ATXI. Which i rate Lillee & Lindwall over the great pigeon & why they would get the new ball as the the two 90 mph bowlers @ their peaks & pigeon would come on 1st change.
Not necessarily. Murali and Warne are close enough to each other that Warne's batting and captaincy nous will usually give him the nod in these kinds of situations.
