|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is better? | |||
| Jeff Thomson |
|
16 | 36.36% |
| Shoaib Akhtar |
|
28 | 63.64% |
| Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: z
Posts: 5,881
|
Akthar or Thomson?
Both were the fastest bowlers of their respective eras, and both played a similar amount of matches.
Tests only, bowling only. Thomson M-51 I-90 W-200 BBI-6/46 BBM-9/105 Avg.-28.00 Eco.-3.18 SR-52.6 4w-16 5w-8 10w-0 Akhtar M-46 I-82 W-178 BBI-6/11 BBM-11/78 Avg.-25.69 Eco.-3.37 SR-45.7 5w-12 10w-2 Last edited by Teja.; 24-03-2010 at 05:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
International Captain
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colombo, SL
Posts: 5,175
|
Mohammed Zahid was the fastest
__________________
Diuretics are used to look good at TV shows I played for 20 years in the Lankan team, I did not have any problems as a Tamil - Muralidaran |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
State Captain
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pune
Posts: 1,857
|
Their records suggest Shoaib was more potent, better average, SR, more 5fers, more 10s and similar ER. If the era Shoaib played in is considered to be tougher for bowlers, and the lack of a quality support consistently through his career is taken into account as a handicap, then it makes his record even more potent compared to Thomson.
IMO Shoaib's behaviour and availability is irrelevant to who was the better bowler. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
International Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: england
Posts: 5,638
|
I wouldn't say Thomson is necessarily a better bowler but I'd take him from 1974/75 and 1975/76 over anyone.
__________________
Not now Maud, I am sprinkling the man in the tent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
International Captain
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 7,020
|
I'd be interested to see the results if Frank Tyson was added to the mix to make a three-way (ho ho) battle.
Though as that would break the seemingly mandatory Australian vs Asian player comparison that we've all become so fond of, I'm not sure if that would be allowed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
U19 Debutant
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 327
|
Thomson's stats in both tests and first class cricket indicate that he was nowhere near as good as he himself thought he was. He does look incredibly fast in his pomp though.
__________________
Keeping it real |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cricket Books | archie mac | Cricket Chat | 1955 | Today 02:36 AM |
| Shoaib Akthar Vs Brett Lee | Precambrian | Cricket Chat | 49 | 02-02-2009 12:17 PM |
| How in the world is Akthar ranked 8th best in the world???? | susudear | Cricket Chat | 53 | 03-01-2009 01:18 PM |
| Could Jeff Thomson have been the greatest? | aussie tragic | Cricket Chat | 68 | 24-11-2006 05:30 AM |
| Most boring player | Western Warrior | Cricket Chat | 50 | 01-11-2004 01:42 PM |