Cricket Web Logo
Cricket Coach 2014 - Order Now
Cricket Web Logo
Australia Bangladesh Bermuda Canada England India Ireland Kenya Netherlands New Zealand Pakistan Scotland South Africa Sri Lanka West Indies Zimbabwe

Benevolent BCCI?

Gulu Ezekiel | 1:19pm gmt 27 May 2012
Benevolent BCCI?
Kapil holding aloft the Prudential Cup in 1983
Trust the BCCI to take a noble gesture and turn it into a tool to settle scores with.

The recent announcement that India's richest sporting body was donating Rs. 70 crore (app. USD 14 million) from the IPL playoffs to nearly 170 ex-cricketers was warmly welcomed.

But in the last few days rumours are swirling over those who are being excluded for one petty reason or the other from this windfall. These rumours have been fuelled by the partial list of beneficiaries released, all part of the lack of transparency that the BCCI is infamous for.

News is that BJP MP Kirti Azad - a member of the victorious 1983 Prudential World Cup team - is being denied his due following his token fast at the Feroze Shah Kotla ground on Sunday where he protested against the IPL and the Board's high-handedness. So it is clear now that once again the BCCI is using money power to silence its critics.

One of cricket's living legends and the captain of that iconic 1983 team, Kapil Dev has also fallen victim to this bullying.

It was Kapil who was one of the architects of the short-lived breakaway Indian Cricket League that was launched in 2007 but faded out after barely two seasons.

The IPL was launched in 2008 partly in a bid to crush the ICL and succeeded soon enough. With the lone T-20 league now woefully short of Indian players, an "amnesty" scheme was announced in 2009 to bring those associated with the ICL back into the "official" fold. Kapil to his eternal credit stuck to his guns and refused to kowtow to the Board.

The Rs. 1.5 crore (USD300,000) he is eligible for may not count for much for this cricketer-turned-tycoon. But in this case it is the BCCI that has emerged as the villain and Kapil as a man of principles.

Ironically, in 2008 on the 25th anniversary of the 1983 victory Kapil and his team were honoured by the BCCI with each player awarded Rs. 25 lakhs (app USD50,000)

Is it too much to expect from some of our icons, including those who played under Kapil's captaincy, to come out publicly in support of their colleagues? Or has the BCCI succeeded in buying their silence too?

Azad is not the only ex-cricketer to voice his concern over the excesses of the IPL and its mega-money power that has shaken the foundations of international cricket and threatens to flatten all those who dare stand in its path. Are some of the other vocal critics also going to be hounded down and blacklisted for expressing their views?

The payments are supposed to honour those who graced the game of cricket in India according to the BCCI's own announcement. Many of those who will benefit played in the days when cricket had few monetary benefits. But it now appears it is being used as a payoff to seal the lips of the cricket fraternity and buy their loyalty.

It has certainly been a bad month for the IPL. Many skeletons are tumbling out of the closet and those on its payrolls are closing ranks in support of the gravy train.
The five young players trapped in the TV sting who claime
d they received under-the-table payments from their franchises blew the lid off the IPL's worst kept secret. But instead of questioning the big-shot owners, it is these hapless cricketers who are being victimised.

Packed with powerful netas from across the political spectrum, the BCCI considers itself above the law. Its refusal to come under the RTI clearly shows it has something to hide. Already the income tax authorities are sniffing around for black money.

Vested interests, cronyism, corruption, opaqueness and pettiness characterise this behemoth of a board. But it should keep in mind the phrase, the bigger they are, the harder they fall.

Remember Lalit Modi?

Bookmark and Share

See nothing wrong with this initiative.

Leaving out Kapil Dev was blasphemy.

Yeah, same here.

hahaha when i heard about I thought similar

Leave a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they have been approved.

Name: (required)
Email: (will not be published) (required)
Verification Image: (required)
verification image, type it in the box
Your Comments: (required)
Over the coming weeks Gulu Ezekiel will be contributing his thoughts on cricket's history as well as some current issues in the game. Hopefully we may also be able to tease out of him some of his best work on other aspects of India's rich sporting heritage.
Recent Comments
interesting story. really find it unusual that there was a precedent set for the use of tera maki th
Major difference between the two is that Clarke will at least warn you before breaking your ****ing
Micheal Clarke does strike me as the kind of person who would run on the pitch, come to think of it.
Except interfere with freedom of association, if they really are blocking the formation of a playe
It's a private body and can do as it pleases, like all private bodies do, as odious as it may be for
I mean the only thing that can even possibly keep the BCCI in check are the players, and there's no
[QUOTE=ganeshran;2859417]There would surely be some implied obligation for cricketers to be supporti
There would surely be some implied obligation for cricketers to be supportive or atleast not be crit