Maddinson a good shout, but the thing with Lyth et al is that they all managed to genuinely impress at some point, whereas I'm ideally looking for people who didn't manage anything particularly impressive at all, perhaps more of a James Vince.Plenty of one cap/test/series wonders. Australia have just recently been running through a few (Nic Naddinson) but seem to have come out of that tunnel now. The last million batsmen who opened alongside Alastair Cook (Lyth etc) is a good place to start also. Simon Kerrigan also. Your first port of call however should always be England of the '90s!!
Yeah, I thought Lyth looked reasonably good at times - especially against us, sadly. There was definitely something to work with.Maddinson a good shout, but the thing with Lyth et al is that they all managed to genuinely impress at some point, whereas I'm ideally looking for people who didn't manage anything particularly impressive at all, perhaps more of a James Vince.
Sadly true about England in the 90s, though.
If the guy got going in one innings people would have loved it. Still time for him at 25. They did pick him at the wrong point of his career, and the "Steve O'Keefe Australian Selection Rule" should now be that you only pick guys for the test team on the back of two or more successful Shield seasons (not BBL seasons).Maddinson a good shout, but the thing with Lyth et al is that they all managed to genuinely impress at some point, whereas I'm ideally looking for people who didn't manage anything particularly impressive at all, perhaps more of a James Vince.
Sadly true about England in the 90s, though.
I would say Rob Quiney but that 9 really was something to beholdMaddinson a good shout, but the thing with Lyth et al is that they all managed to genuinely impress at some point, whereas I'm ideally looking for people who didn't manage anything particularly impressive at all, perhaps more of a James Vince.
Sadly true about England in the 90s, though.
Yes, he had a good knock against New Zealand as I recall; I think he is a guy who ''might have came good'' (like many of Cook's rejects) but fell on the wrong side of the selectors' eternal conundrum on ''to reject or persevere (with)?''. Vince I recall - I never saw him play on the county circuit - seemed to be a guy with only one shot in his artillery, an elegant cover drive! He also seemed to always make 30-something before getting out. With both these guys, it is the classic example of excellent county players who fell woefully short. You just wonder how Lyth, making runs for breakfast, lunch and tea alongside Lees, cannot convert that at test level. But then guys do exactly that all the time (Jennings)!Maddinson a good shout, but the thing with Lyth et al is that they all managed to genuinely impress at some point, whereas I'm ideally looking for people who didn't manage anything particularly impressive at all, perhaps more of a James Vince.
Sadly true about England in the 90s, though.
Claim to fame. Punter's uncle.Greg Campbell
In the same vein Michael Beer. He only took one 5-for in his whole first class career.Played a couple of Tests in two separate series so technically doesn't count but Xavier Doherty comes to mind.
Never really a force in first-class cricket (average 42.65) and despite playing two of his four Tests in the more favourable spin conditions of India, ended with a significantly worse Test career average of 78.28