• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why is Australia so weak against tail enders?

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The title says it all.

How come we can run through top orders, but have now on numerous occasions been unable to dismiss tail enders at crucial times? This is the third series it has cost us in the last three years FFS.
 

Matt79

Global Moderator
Lacking the Warneh tbh. People seriously underrate in this day and age how valuable it is knocking over the whole tail for <50 runs.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
No offence Stephen, but as I've mentioned so many times on this forum, this is an example of people thinking their team is the only one that suffers from some sort of fault/habit that happens to every team.

England fans ALWAYS talk about their inability to get tailenders out.

Plenty of times Indian fans have mentioned it too.

It's not an Australian thing at all.

This, plus every team thinking they have the "typical" batting collapse trademarked, is so commonly said on this forum, when it happens to every team.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Heaps of teams are bad against the tail tbf. A lot of it is to do with the expectation that a few of your bowlers need to know how to hold a bat these days, so number nines and even number tens are capable of scoring runs.

The days of the phailbunneh are on the way out. Chris Martin's impending retirement or dropping will be a blow to them.
 

Flem274*

123/5
This, plus every team thinking they have the "typical" batting collapse trademarked, is so commonly said on this forum, when it happens to every team.
What if it's not a collapse so much as an inevitable? NZ and Pakistan the ones scrapping for rights on that surely?
 

Himannv

International Coach
Sri Lanka used to have this problem for ages. Malinga (more in the shorter formats) and Murali have somehow done their share to help us out imo.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
Heaps of teams are bad against the tail tbf. A lot of it is to do with the expectation that a few of your bowlers need to know how to hold a bat these days, so number nines and even number tens are capable of scoring runs.

The days of the phailbunneh are on the way out.
Chris Martin's impending retirement or dropping will be a blow to them.
This, tbh.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Jono makes an excellent point but as an outside observer I have to say that Australia are indeed particularly bad at it.

The reason's pretty simple, they just suck at bowling to the tail. Bowl too short, fields go defensive too quickly, don't attack the stumps, and no real strike bowler to turn to when things get hairy.
 
Last edited:

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
No offence Stephen, but as I've mentioned so many times on this forum, this is an example of people thinking their team is the only one that suffers from some sort of fault/habit that happens to every team.

England fans ALWAYS talk about their inability to get tailenders out.

Plenty of times Indian fans have mentioned it too.

It's not an Australian thing at all.

This, plus every team thinking they have the "typical" batting collapse trademarked, is so commonly said on this forum, when it happens to every team.
I realise that most teams have problems occasionally, but we have really suffered with an Ashes defeat, losing at home to South Africa and now losing to India. All because we cannot get a number 10 and 11 out.

This has all been in the last three years. It's getting frustrating.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
The only reason the ones involving Australia have particularly been remembered is that it has happened in losses, or has resulted in a lost series.

In other matches it has happened to teams when they were already pummeled by the top order and then couldn't get out the tail to make it even worse, or they couldn't get out the tail but ended up winning anyway.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
It's an illusion created by the fact that it's happened to Australia at such crucial moments.

In the last three years (which is a timeframe someone mentioned), Australia have actually been the third best team at bowling to tailenders. Bangladesh have actually been the best, surprisingly, although we can possibly put that down to declaration hitting.

Code:
v Bangladesh	13.64
v Sri Lanka	15.14
v Australia	15.69
v New Zealand	15.95
v South Africa	16.21
v England	17.42
v India		17.61
v Pakistan	19.09
v West Indies	19.15
 

Redbacks

International Captain
Thus:

Why are we so bad at bowling to the tail in crucial moment in test matches?

Field placements and poor planning as mentioned in previous posts being a factor. On dead tracks teams seem to execute poor plans against the tail. A bit of life in the wicket and they pretty much fall over. Therefore I would put it down to teams having a generic plan against the tail that works well in some cases but doesn't work so well when they knuckle down.
 
Last edited:

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Because top order batsmen play over-aggressively and throw their wickets knowing that even tail-enders can do the job against Aussie bowlers :p
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Stop BBMing me about how much you feel like an Englishman trapped in an Australian's body you ****
 

Top