no I'm not suggesting that.
Yes I'm sure hendrix is an awful runner between wickets in situations where he's already had one mankadding warning and is, for some reason, playing under the ICC revised playing conditions for international cricket.
I am actually, but that's more due to schizophrenic decision making than my method of backing up.
We have that in common. Sadly mine extends beyond cricket...
Not many mate. It's footy season.
nah it's really not all that hypocritical if you read what he was saying. The first thing he said was that he placed some of the blame on his own player. The next is that he'd give the batsman a warning, as well as ask the umpire to police it.
The headline is obviously exaggerated click bait but even still, Mahela said:
That's obviously not what Sri Lanka did here. They reviewed England's innings from the previous games and made a conscious effort to try and get a mankad dismissal. They did warn him first, but they still went ahead of with the appeal when they got him the second time despite everything Dan pointed out. They didn't just try to make sure he stayed in his crease or talk to the umpires as per the above.
He's bowling spin. Who doesn't watch the ball out of the hand.
The skeletons in the cupb oard are surely haunting. Otherwise difficult to hear about these hallucinations.
