I think in this case ranking by median bid (6th bid) maybe a straightforward yet relatively accurate reflection of everyone's relative advantages.I think his was much more of a relative metric, but you're right that it was better. Some of us small brain people need something more straightforward though.
|Drafter||5th pick||6th pick||Median pick|
|Line and Length||100||107||103.5|
Honestly speaking, I had no bidding strategy at all!It'll be interesting to see how similar the bidding strategies of the winning teams are - whether they're similar or very different because you can only have one good team for each style of strategy
Can you post median too?
Drafter Average pick Line and Length 78.5 Himannv 65.5 honestbharani 65.0 weldone 55.2 kingkallis 63.0 JOJOXI 59.2 ankitj 61.5 Michaelf7777777 56.4 Magrat Garlick 58.8 ataraxia 54.7 weeman27bob 53.3
I'm not sure this actually means anything useful
My picks weren't the best mainly because I don't really care about ODI ATGs and I've never played an ODI draft before. Just thought I might play because the BFP draft format is really interesting.I still think ataraxia had the best bidding strategy picking those first 6 players around the top for around 150k each. But in my estimate he made a slight error of judgement in not picking a gun pace bowler among his first 6 picks (those 6 picks were all spinner, allrounders and batsmen iirc).