Great shout. My first thought was Daryll Cullinan.Of the ones I've seen it has to be Richards.
and all those saffies were no slouches of playing pace. Cullinan certainly worth a mention.
On current form, I'd have a toss up between Sangakkara and Kallis
Lara performed worse vs Donald ( SA ) and wasim/waqar (Pak ) than Sachin and I think he was quite a bit lesser against genuine quality pace bowling than Sachin ( better against spin though )I had always thought that high-quality pace was the weakest area of Tendulkar's game. Not necessarily bad but not outstanding like the rest of his batsmanship. He certainly has performed worse against Pakistan and South Africa than other countries and the one thing they have had in common over his career is a production line of high-quality fast bowlers.
Lara basically ran hot and cold but when he was on, pace bowling was dismissed like everything else. McGrath did sort him out but that is not a huge cross against anyone.
I never thought Aravinda was that great a batsman so maybe a personal bias against him. Never noticed him being particularly great against pace.
Inzi was pretty comfortable against pace per se and had a lot of time to play ( more than anyone else I've seen ) . But he wasn't as comfortable against the movement. Hence his record outside of the SC isn't that good . That bumps him down a bit IMOI would put Inzi and Ponting both ahead of Tendulkar.Infact,in the last 20 odd years those two would be the best players of fast bowling i've seen,with not a lot to choose between them.
Disagree, Ashes 2005 in particular proved he was vulnerable against good seam/swing bowling. ( at his peak ). Of course outside of that there is Gough, the recent Ashes, Asif/Aamer in England, Ishant etc .... Bond also made him his bunny in ODIsPlaying seam bowling - Ponting at his peak, of everyone I've seen. Didn't look like getting out, and could score at a Gilchrist-like pace if he wanted to.
I'd say Inzi or him probablyPure pace is definitely Ponting too.
disagree, against top quality pace bowling, I'd take Sachin/Steve over him .In terms of playing all kinds of pace in any conditions, especially in terms of difficulty of getting out, peak Dravid of the ones I've seen.
Except only Trott could play Asif/Aamer wellThe current crop of English batsmen are all very good against pace.
His statistics against Pakistan must be taken in context. He made his debut as a sixteen year old in Pakistan against Imran, Waqar, Wasim and Qadir. After that series in 1989, the only series India-Pakistan played (IIRC) was in 1999, where he scored a magnificent last innings century against Wasim, Waqar and Saqlain (and he was far from fully fit in that innings). Interestingly enough, it is Saqlain and Qadir who got Tendulkar out more often, if I am not mistaken. Wasim and Waqar only dismissed him once each (this is from memory, have to check it) EDIT : yes, Saqlain got him thrice; Qadir, Wasim and Waqar got him once; Imran got him twice. Basically, the blot in his record is his "failures" against Pakistan in the mid 2000s - a period in which he had one of the worst runs in his entire career, courtesy his tennis elbow woes and poor form, and a period in which the Sehwags of the world (hardly known for their prowess against great pace bowling) have Bradmanesque averages in India-Pakistan matches.I had always thought that high-quality pace was the weakest area of Tendulkar's game. Not necessarily bad but not outstanding like the rest of his batsmanship. He certainly has performed worse against Pakistan and South Africa than other countries and the one thing they have had in common over his career is a production line of high-quality fast bowlers.
Lara basically ran hot and cold but when he was on, pace bowling was dismissed like everything else. McGrath did sort him out but that is not a huge cross against anyone.
I never thought Aravinda was that great a batsman so maybe a personal bias against him. Never noticed him being particularly great against pace.
Richards was one, de Silva was another and so was Inzi when it came to handling short stuff. All three I rate as good as Ponting against short stuff. And these guys did play some quickest short stuff too.Ponting. Not many batsmen could destroy pace bowling like he could, especially short bowling.
Cook in his recent form would do well against them IMO and Bell was missing (who performed well against Steyn and co. in SA, saving a Test in Cape Town IIRC). I agree Pietersen in his recent form looks shaky against any kind of quality bowling and Strauss seems to have developed a weakness to left-armers recently.Except only Trott could play Asif/Aamer well
Lara averaged something like 50+ against McGrath. McGrath rated him the best batsman he has bowled to when he retired.. He sorted Lara out as much as Lara sorted him out..I had always thought that high-quality pace was the weakest area of Tendulkar's game. Not necessarily bad but not outstanding like the rest of his batsmanship. He certainly has performed worse against Pakistan and South Africa than other countries and the one thing they have had in common over his career is a production line of high-quality fast bowlers.
Lara basically ran hot and cold but when he was on, pace bowling was dismissed like everything else. McGrath did sort him out but that is not a huge cross against anyone.
I never thought Aravinda was that great a batsman so maybe a personal bias against him. Never noticed him being particularly great against pace.
he doesn't have a poor record against anyone.You may be right about Tendulkar. I might be just remembering his relatively poor record against SA and interpreting it as a weakness against pace.