League is not expanding, it is contracting.broncoman said:for the last time, league us not dying, its expanding...
afl will enjoy a smaller slice of the pie in 15 years with the emergence of football as a major code in australia, but all in all all the sports will hold the same standings as what they have now in 2020...
just a silly mistake. my apologies.broncoman said:why did u quote me as saying them when it was kyle??
He (I hope I'm assuming correctly) didn't think I was capable of such a sensible statement.broncoman said:why did u quote me as saying them when it was kyle??
I'd rather have a player in my team like Lockyer who can give me 80 minutes of solid football and will do the job himself rather than relying on the forwards giving him extra space. Johns may be able to pull the odd gift out of the bag, but it is all to infrequent, and really when the forwards don't dominate he goes into his shell, whereas in the same situation Lockyer grabs the ball and does the hard work.vic_orthdox said:that's probably why i rate johns higher. what your capable of (especially in the big games, or in clutch situations) is probably the most important part of a champion in my eyes, which is probably why i rate lara over tendulkar, and think gary ablett was the greatest AFL player ever....and maybe because i barrack for geelong
I'll be the first NSW supporter to admit as much then if it turns out that way at the end of ths season....as I said, personally I don't believe the comparison can be made until they both play this season, as I think John's was the best player in the world when he got injured. Lockyer only stepped up to the five eighth role while Johns was away from the game.Mister Wright said:No. It hurt me bad, but after Langer's abilities declined I admitted that Johns was the best player in the game. I doubt you would ever find a N.S.W. supporter ever admitting that a Qld player was the best in the world. However, the time Lockyer has spent at fullback now allows him to be one step ahead of everyone else in the game, he can read the game a lot better than any other player. He might not have the long kicking game tha Johns has, but his short kicking game is far superior. Johns is an awesome defender, but Lockyer, if not matching him in that department, is not far behind him. Lockyer just seems to have tha extra zing and forsight that Johns doesn't have. Johns may be the more 'freakish' player but Lockyer is the more solid and more dependable more often.
Fair enough then.broncoman said:yeh, but even then clubs are limited to how much their players or their immediate family can be paid by a third party thats linked to the club...
the clubs are watched very closely and theres no chance of getting away with even a minor breach, Brisbane are one of 12 clubs who have been fined in the last 3 years for breaching the cap this way, so i doubt any money problems they may have are linked with over payment...
Having watched Lockyer in some State of Origin games in the past I'd have to disagree. When the forwards aren't working he (as with other halves/backs) all but disappears....he might pull something out of the bag against lesser teams in the premiership, but against top quality defence where his forwards are struggling to give him space he's the same as the rest.Mister Wright said:I'd rather have a player in my team like Lockyer who can give me 80 minutes of solid football and will do the job himself rather than relying on the forwards giving him extra space. Johns may be able to pull the odd gift out of the bag, but it is all to infrequent, and really when the forwards don't dominate he goes into his shell, whereas in the same situation Lockyer grabs the ball and does the hard work.
That will never happen. I've never heard it suggested, eitherTriple Crown said:And League could have real problems if Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Super League in the UK, tries to merge it with Union in Europe, as has been suggested.
I know there probably isn't any real international Aussie Rules games, but when I occasionally used to watch it when it was on Channel 4 over here I seem recall there being an Irish Aussie Rules team. Unless I imagined it they'd beaten Australia too. Is this true?Triple Crown said:Also, Australians LOVE playing for Australia. The only footy codes that have real international staure are Union & Soccer. This hurts AFL & League. And League could have real problems if Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Super League in the UK, tries to merge it with Union in Europe, as has been suggested. Then Aust would have only the Kiwis & PNG to play and that would be like a nail in the coffin.
Gotcha.vic_orthdox said:australia and ireland play a hybrid game as a series of two at the end of each afl season (not sure whether it is before or after the irish season) as gaelic and australian rules have a number of similarities, or so we're told.
Yeah, reduce the teams to, say 13-a-side, do away with rucks & mauls and.....hang on.....Triple Crown said:Union's a great game but there are too many players on the park and cowardly violence such as stomping, raking & eye gouging goes unpunished. Address these 2 issues & Union will rival Soccer as the dominant footy code worldwide.