That is the most epic picture I've ever seen.
What. A. Great.
Another superb post; agree with every point but particularly the bolded. The footwork of prime Dravid to the swinging and seaming ball was without question the best of this era.Since his debut he has been one of the best test batsman in world cricket. I have him in tier 1 along with Tendulkar, Lara, Ponting, Kallis and Sangakkara. Of those he was the best at playing the moving ball, and probably was India's best batsman of the 2000s.
He should be remembered as a player who had a superb defensive technique and extremely good powers of concentration and mental strength, but also as a player with all the shots in the book, and one who could stylishly take apart bowling attacks when he occasionally wanted to. He was clinical at putting away the bad ball, and I think his strokeplay and elegance is and was sometimes forgotten in his overall reputation.
An all-time great player, a great team man, an adaptable player and someone India could count on time and time again, responsible for their greatest achievements.
In a way, that's the mark of the man, that supporters from each country think of him almost as one of their own. That said, "Australian" is probably the last adjective I'd use of him.None of India's batsmen do .
Actually, ironically, the only one who seemed kinda 'Australian'.
That is incredibly awesome.
What. A. Great.
In a way, that's the mark of the man, that supporters from each country think of him almost as one of their own. That said, "Australian" is probably the last adjective I'd use of him.
Well, I guess it depends what you'd attach to that adjective. Nor am I trying to suggest that is what all players should attempt to be. It's just that he seemed far more identifiable with as an Australian who watched our matches against India.Yea, he's Australian like Dennis Lillee was Indian.
And pray tell which team had the monopoly on that?Dravid had far too much class to be thought of as an Australian.
I don't think the Australian public warmed to Dravid as much as they did with Sachin and Laxman, and you'd think the Australians would warm to someone who was similar to their own.Well, I guess it depends what you'd attach to that adjective. Nor am I trying to suggest that is what all players should attempt to be. It's just that he seemed far more identifiable with as an Australian who watched our matches against India.
Yeah, if anything Dravid seems more 'English' so to speak, which I think is reflected in how highly he's thought of over here.I don't think the Australian public warmed to Dravid as much as they did with Sachin and Laxman, and you'd think the Australians would warm to someone who was similar to their own.
Fair enough.I wasn't referring to whom the general public received well or for whatever reason they did so. I was explaining the reasons why I liked him more.