marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
Agarkar is an honour.Agarkar is not bad enough?
Agarkar is an honour.Agarkar is not bad enough?
The one in the OP.What bet are you talking about Wise guy?
But Biased Indian took your bet and you can't really make that bet with more than one person ?The one in the OP.
There were certain posters who were absolutely adamant that India would win, yet completely chickened out of taking my bet.
English people are pricks, you'll get no argument from me on thatBtw, Same could be said about certain English members not taking Daemon's bet except Weemanbob.
I dunno mate - Swann ending up with more wickets than Harbhajan, or him getting Tendulkar/Sehwag out X number of times? No clue, really. It wasn't a bet you made with me. Speaking of bets, is our bet still on (the one I mentioned in the post you quoted)?What was the Swann bet?
You're on!!A bowler will outscore Tendulkar at Lord's.
2 weeks.
Actually, anyone up for an avatar bet? I say Harbhajan ends up with a better bowling average than Swann.
I have this with Manan for a monthYou're on. **** I love Swann.
But we're good to go too.Marcuss to confirm if this is still on.
i'll take that. He plays minimum 2 tests though.Ishant Sharma will have the best bowling average of any Indian bowler* to play in the series.
Two weeks.
*by bowler, I mean exactly that. If Sehwag bowls 2 overs all series and takes 1 wicket for 1 run, that doesn't count.
I don't recall stipulating that.i'll take that. He plays minimum 2 tests though.
I'll put it in big letters so you can see it more clearly as it seems to be confusing you.ok. I'll take that in anycase. There is no minimum matches stipulation for any bowler then?
Ishant Sharma will have the best bowling average of any Indian bowler* to play in the series.
Two weeks.
*by bowler, I mean exactly that. If Sehwag bowls 2 overs all series and takes 1 wicket for 1 run, that doesn't count.