Fiery
Banned
"Delighted"...such a nanna wordDelighted to have won the Saj, I knew my anger had to come out in a constructive way some day. Congratulations to all winners and thanks to the awards team.
"Delighted"...such a nanna wordDelighted to have won the Saj, I knew my anger had to come out in a constructive way some day. Congratulations to all winners and thanks to the awards team.
"Delighted"...such a nanna word
Have a drink
It was the funniest post. Easily. Also the post which won in it's place was not remotely funny. The person who gave it the award should step down from the panel on moral grounds.
**** off
.....**** off
oh I'm so delighted you're delightedThanks for the Warney. Delighted
sorry, well done for the award, just laughing at the word delighted....it's so Judy GarlandUm, okay.
Haha, my first ever CW Award.
Some people are never, ever satisfied...Dire. I should have won them all.
I give him a Sobers and what does he do in return?Agarkar/Mohammed award for ('At least they’re trying' award)
just like the players this award is named after, they may not be quite good enough for any other award, but at least we remember them. And the Winner is: Richard Richard for his repeated insistence that test records were debatable, in the Murali thread.
I only give out two awards a week and you got both of them - be greatful.I give him a Sobers and what does he do in return?
Yours was at least amusing, I suppose.
Have I gotten one before?
Marc used it (repeatedly, on me) as a patronising Award, so much so that Sean decided to introduce the two-weeks-in-a-row maximum on said Award. Not exclusively did he use it such, but often enough. Gelman changed that completely, and generally used it as an "encouragement" thing.I only give out two awards a week and you got both of them - be greatful.
Reading back on how the A/M was originally designed by Marc, it attempts to recognise the efforts of someone throughout the week - especially if they have continued to push a point without backing down despite the disapproval of others. This makes you a likely candidate most weeks if one of a few topics are brought up - one being the idea that one can decide one's own criteria for test matches.
Marc outlined that here. I endeavour to make it less negative than that though, and broaden it to anyone who sticks to their guns on a subject despite little support - wacky idea or otherwise.