Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22-08-2010, 04:09 AM   #16 (permalink)
International Coach
 
G.I.Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: India
Posts: 10,223
Peaks - Waqar > McGrath/Shoaib, not really aware of any peak McGrath may have had.

Overall, McGrath > Waqar > Shoaib

If we're talking overall in the Ian Botham sense, Waqar > McGrath > Shoaib
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Athlai View Post
If GI 'Best Poster On The Forum' Joe says it then it must be true.
Athlai doesn't lie. And he doesn't do sarcasm either, so you know it's true!
G.I.Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 04:09 AM   #17 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
aussie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cricket
Posts: 16,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noble One View Post
Maybe the key question is, when was McGrath at his absolute peak? I find it hard to pick out a single season from his entire career he was that consistent.
I'd say McGrath was @ his ulitmate peak between SA 96/97 (Centurion test) to Ashes 2002/03 (MCG Test). He was his usual metronmoic accurate self but was capable of bowling in the high 80s consistently & a few times he may have touched 90 mph, during that period.

Pre SA 96/97 of course he had the period of WI 94/95 - WI 96/97 where he had just become test quality - but no-one was calling him a great yet then during this breakout period. Then post Ashes 2002/03 (when he had the injury in the 4th test) - Ashes 06/07 when he still had the metronomic accuracy of SA 96/97 - Ashes 02/03 - but he was basically now medium pace (80-83 mph, sometimes under 75-79 range). During this Ashes 02/03-Ashes 06/07, he had that period in 2003 when he came back from injury after the 02/03 Ashes & WC 2003 triumph where during the WI & BANG test he looked absolutely woeful in those series & missed the remainder of 03 & most of 2004.I rememvber the selectors & commentators where questioning his place in the side during that injury lay-off. Before pigeon cam back vs SRI 04 with an immediate 5 wicket haul & straight through until Ashes 06/07 retirement - continued to proved his greatness. But McGrath certainly did have a peak.

Last edited by aussie; 22-08-2010 at 04:24 AM.
aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 04:16 AM   #18 (permalink)
Cricket Spectator
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London UK
Posts: 15
To clarify, by "peak" I mean the best 1-2 seasons of their career; you may choose whichever of those you want. I take it then that most people see it as:
  1. Waqar Younis
  2. Shoaib Akhtar
  3. Glenn McGrath

But was Waqar during his best year (or Shoaib during his best year - I didn't get that clear of response on this) the best of any pace bowler ever in their respective peak years?
GameGod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 04:33 AM   #19 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
aussie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cricket
Posts: 16,845
Including Shoaib in this debate is unfair. His peak although deadly cant comapre with McGrath & Waqar.

Waqar well known peak was between 1989-1994 (before he sufffered a back injury which kept him out of cricket for a year & he was never the same again). Where he took 190 wickets: 33 tests: @ 19.15. Stunning stuff.

While McGrath as i suggested above did have a peak between Centurion 1997 to MCG 2002, when he was metronomical but bowling @ his fastest. He took 309 wickets: 64 tests: @ 20.08

Its more even than people think. With Waqar bowling probably just being more eye-catching to people @ his peak.
aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 04:38 AM   #20 (permalink)
State Vice-Captain
 
Debris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,259
Younis was extremely lethal at times (more so than McGrath and probably anyone) but his bowling seemed to be very condition dependent. He never seemed to do well in Australia, for example, and at times looked pedestrian. McGrath seemed to bowl well regardless of conditions which is why I would still pick him.

Akhtar is clearly third behind the other two.

Last edited by Debris; 22-08-2010 at 04:39 AM.
Debris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 04:49 AM   #21 (permalink)
International Captain
 
kingkallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: India
Posts: 5,721
@their peaks,

Waqar >> McGrath >>>>> Shoaib

@overall,

McGrath >> Waqar >>>>> Shoaib
__________________
CricZo XI - Draft League

Season 1 M Hayden, G Gooch, R Dravid, W Hammond, K Pietersen, G Sobers, R Marsh (wk), R Benaud (c), D Steyn, W Hall, N Adcock

Season 2 J Hobbs, B Richards, D Boon, H Taylor, C Lloyd (c), A Stewart (wk), T Goddard, A Davidson, H Tayfield, C Ambrose, H Griffith

Season 3 H Sutcliffe, M Hayden, I Chappell (c), G Pollock, A Faulkner, M Hussey, D Lindsay (wk), I Botham, A Kumble, M Marshall, D Lillee
kingkallis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 04:55 AM   #22 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
GingerFurball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Crabs Subbie
Posts: 15,457
McGrath easily. His "peak" lasted about 7 years, I'd take 7 years of excellence over a shorter peak.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by silentstriker View Post
Yup, much more likely. In any case, I will back [Insert Indian Random Batting Order] against Swann in India every day. If they win, it won't be on Swann's back - though he could be valuable to keep things tight and maybe a wicket or two.
GingerFurball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 05:12 AM   #23 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Teja.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: z
Posts: 5,882
Waqar's lasted five too, tbf. Not his fault that Pakistan played only 33 tests in a period where he was taking wickets at 6 wpm while striking at slightly above thirty at an average below twenty.
Teja. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 05:54 AM   #24 (permalink)
vcs
International Coach
 
vcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 10,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie View Post
Including Shoaib in this debate is unfair. His peak although deadly cant comapre with McGrath & Waqar.

Waqar well known peak was between 1989-1994 (before he sufffered a back injury which kept him out of cricket for a year & he was never the same again). Where he took 190 wickets: 33 tests: @ 19.15. Stunning stuff.

While McGrath as i suggested above did have a peak between Centurion 1997 to MCG 2002, when he was metronomical but bowling @ his fastest. He took 309 wickets: 64 tests: @ 20.08

Its more even than people think. With Waqar bowling probably just being more eye-catching to people @ his peak.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Debris View Post
Younis was extremely lethal at times (more so than McGrath and probably anyone) but his bowling seemed to be very condition dependent. He never seemed to do well in Australia, for example, and at times looked pedestrian. McGrath seemed to bowl well regardless of conditions which is why I would still pick him.

Akhtar is clearly third behind the other two.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
McGrath easily. His "peak" lasted about 7 years, I'd take 7 years of excellence over a shorter peak.
Yeah, agree with these.
vcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 09:54 AM   #25 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Uppercut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 21,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Alex View Post
This.

Akthar could crack open any batting lineup in the world at his peak. Waqar was brilliant in his early years.
True. McGrath could crack open any batting lineup in the world for pretty much his entire career.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by zaremba View Post
The Filth have comfortably the better bowling. But the Gash have the batting. Might be quite good to watch.
Uppercut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 10:00 AM   #26 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Athlai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wellywood, NZ
Posts: 26,001
Waqar easily because he was at one stage the greatest bowler ever. It's as simple as that in my mind.
__________________
Direbirds FTW!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Athlai View Post
Wellington will win the whole thing next year. Mark my words.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flem274* View Post
I'll offer up my avatar to Athlai forever if Wellington wins the Champions League.
President of T.I.T.S
Tamim Is Talented Society
Athlai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 10:06 AM   #27 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Athlai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wellywood, NZ
Posts: 26,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie View Post

Its more even than people think. With Waqar bowling probably just being more eye-catching to people @ his peak.
See I disagree with this, sure McGrath was phenomenal at this time but Waqar's peak was just stellar.

His SR was 13 better than McGraths! And from those figures you mentioned Waqar took more 5fers and 10fers despite playing only about half the matches of McGrath. Waqar was taking about a whole wicket more per match. The averages stay similar but Waqar was just far far more accomplished as a strike bowler.
Athlai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 11:55 AM   #28 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teja. View Post
Waqar's lasted five too, tbf. Not his fault that Pakistan played only 33 tests in a period where he was taking wickets at 6 wpm while striking at slightly above thirty at an average below twenty.
It could be speculated that he only maintained that rate because he had more time between games, rather than having to back it up time after time in a much shorter time period.
__________________
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

Anyone want to join the Society?

Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 12:18 PM   #29 (permalink)
The Wheel is Forever
 
silentstriker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 36,546
McGrath >>> Waqar >>>>>>>> Akhtar
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KungFu_Kallis View Post
Peter Siddle top scores in both innings....... Matthew Wade gets out twice in one ball
"The future light cone of the next Indian fast bowler is exactly the same as the past light cone of the previous one"
-My beliefs summarized in words much more eloquent than I could come up with

How the Universe came from nothing
silentstriker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 12:43 PM   #30 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: england
Posts: 5,638
This should have been a poll then everyone could have voted for McGrath and gone to bed.
Lillian Thomson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mystery Draft 3 - Global Premier League Athlai Cricket Chat 712 19-04-2010 02:06 AM
Waqar Younis appointed coach of Pakistan (and for 21 months!!!) shikha Cricket Chat 10 06-03-2010 09:30 AM
Amazing Waqar Younis Sanz Cricket Chat 31 12-01-2010 06:06 AM
Mystery Draft V.2 (1989-2009) Mupariwa_Magic Cricket Chat 492 21-11-2009 01:00 PM
Northern Hemisphere Vs Southern taitmachine Cricket Chat 19 09-02-2008 08:34 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web