Guest writer Peter Kettle considers the case for governing bodies of athletics, cricket and football to break-away from the World Anti-Doping Agency and develop their own regimes.
In January and February, Peter Kettle made a thorough-going evaluation of proposals put forward by others for the treatment of Not Out innings in deriving batting averages. He also made recommendations and showed what effect these would have on traditional averages for a sizeable sample of Test batsmen.
In this Epilogue, he considers what the famous 20 th century philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein – a radical thinker and cricket enthusiast – would have proposed in a scenario talking to Denis Compton at The Oval ground in the summer of 1947.
In Part 1, guest writer Peter Kettle offers some different thoughts on this book
Guest writer Peter Kettle frames recommendations for treating Not Out innings in deriving batting averages, and applies them to fifty Test careers
Guest writer Peter Kettle continues his decoding and critique of proposals to reform batting averages
Guest writer Peter Kettle decodes and critiques proposals made to reform batting averages
In Part 3 of our three part feature on Don Bradman Peter Kettle presents his conclusions
Part 2 of Peter Kettle’s three part feature on Donald Bradman introduces other sports into his contribution to the debate
Just how good was Donald Bradman? It is a much debated question and in this three part feature guest writer Peter Kettle gives us his take on it