Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
So can batsmen, but seldom performing at a level worthy of consistent Test selection.shaka said:spinners can last to their 40's, so it is plenty of time for him to lower his average.
So can batsmen, but seldom performing at a level worthy of consistent Test selection.shaka said:spinners can last to their 40's, so it is plenty of time for him to lower his average.
I'm surprised at the lack of times he has played for Sri Lanka.SJS said:I saw Sri Lanka's Herath today bowling against pakistan. He doesnt seem bad at all. Surely good enough to be included in the short list ?
I would tend to agree.marc71178 said:I know we never say never (look at the way Giles' numbers fell this summer), but with so many wickets behind him, he'll need to get incredible figures for a number of years to get it down to 32!
For a long time it did look like he was only in the team as there was no better option for variety (very much like Giles)Tim said:Let's not make excuses for Vettori, because at times over the last 3 years he has not played well when he has really been required to.
marc71178 said:For a long time it did look like he was only in the team as there was no better option for variety (very much like Giles)
Giles has suddenly become a weapon in his own right, will we now see Vettori do the same?
A knee, an ankle, Wayne Phillips and an SCG fence.Craig said:BTW what ever happened to ex- Australian left arm finger spinner Brad Young?
well as someone mentioned above, vettori is apparently the best spinner in the country. add that to the fact that he is developing into a decent batsman suggests that he deserves his place in the squad until they can find a better spinner.Macka said:He is very frustrating. What is more annoying is NZ's media not seeing Vettori's recent performaces for what they were. He is often referred to as a 'match winner' and Fleming brings him on in situations that you would expect a match winner to bowl, but he rarely delivers.
He should of been dropped by now, he was living on reputation alone before the last test. What is more frustrating is Vettori being groomed as the next captain, which pretty much guarantees his place in the team.
Him performing against Bangladesh is all good and well. However if he goes back to his recent form against Australia and Sri Lanka (let's face it - he'll be picked even if he bowls poorly against the Aussies), he *has* to be dropped. He's obviously not injured since he is playing, and he changed his action a long time ago. There are just no excuses for him anymore.
From what I've been told, he is just playing grade and still performing quite well.Craig said:So has Andre gave away cricket or just doing the rounds in Adelaide club cricket.
Or maybe a certain South Australia SM and Mod maybe able to shed some more light when he is around.
I dont think that Giles was a much different bowler two years ago. He just had a skipper who did not use him as an attacking bowler. If Vaughan used him to "attack" outside the leg stump from over the wicket to right handers, he would appear as the same ineffective bowler that he did under Nasser.shaka said:He will follow the same path if he continuously gets 8 wickets in the match, maybe even be better rated than Giles.
Didn't he come in for cover in the '97 Ashes series as well, as a matter of convenience?Andre said:From what I've been told, he is just playing grade and still performing quite well.
But he did his ankle at the SCG in 1998 sliding into the fence - didn't play much for Australia after that, then did his knee in the 2001-02 pre-season and came back in an unfit manner. When Wayne Phillips was appointed SA coach he wasn't offered a playing contract for 2003/04 - at this stage from what I can see he is well behind Dan Cullen and John Davison for a first-class berth.