24h was what I said earlier.What did we decide on in the end for a time limit per selection - 12 or 24 hours? I'm happy to go either way with whatever the majority wants.
Round 1:
1. Matt79 Andy Flower
2. metallics2006 MS Dhoni
3. Stephen Courtney Walsh
4. Somerset Waqar Younis
5. bunny Ian Bishop
6. Marc71178 Jason Gillespie
7. BoyBrumby
8. GingerFurball
9. Blakus
10. NUFAN
Round 2:
1. NUFAN
2. Blakus
3. GingerFurball
4. BoyBrumby
5. Marc71178
6. bunny
7. Somerset
8. Stephen
9. metallics2006
10. Matt79
Round 1:
1. Matt79 Andy Flower
2. metallics2006 MS Dhoni
3. Stephen Courtney Walsh
4. Somerset Waqar Younis
5. bunny Ian Bishop
6. Marc71178 Jason Gillespie
7. BoyBrumby Shoaib Akhtar
8. GingerFurball Chris Cairns
9. Blakus
10. NUFAN
Round 2:
1. NUFAN
2. Blakus
3. GingerFurball
4. BoyBrumby
5. Marc71178
6. bunny
7. Somerset
8. Stephen
9. metallics2006
10. Matt79
Round 1:
1. Matt79 Andy Flower
2. metallics2006 MS Dhoni
3. Stephen Courtney Walsh
4. Somerset Waqar Younis
5. bunny Ian Bishop
6. Marc71178 Jason Gillespie
7. BoyBrumby Shoaib Akhtar
8. GingerFurball Chris Cairns
9. Blakus Richard Hadlee
10. NUFAN Virender Sehwag
Round 2:
1. NUFAN Shane Bond
2. Blakus Malcolm Marshall
3. GingerFurball
4. BoyBrumby
5. Marc71178
6. bunny
7. Somerset
8. Stephen
9. metallics2006
10. Matt79
Marshall's wpm in the 90s was only 3.3, which is good, but not Great. Still, he'd be a handy bowler to have.Cheers Blakus, I looked at Marshall who is easily the best bowler overall, but with him not even getting one five-for in the 1990s, I just figured he wasn't quite as dominant as Bond (from 1990 and onwards), despite only playing 3 matches less.
Even if they were both on the wrong side of 32 they would have been a fearsome combination.Yeah I did think about that. He certainly wasn't as great as he was in the 80's
But honestly the thought of Hadlee an Marshall paired up together just proved to irresistible.