fredfertang
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yorkshire did have a leggie, Eddie Leadbeater, who was good enough to get a couple of Tests for England in India in 51/52 but the Yorkies lost patience with him in his third season in 52 and that was that
Yes, my frustration is more towards the stupidity of the selectors.i never said such a thing, i feel australia should pick their best bowlers and best batsmen, and simply get off their arses and bowl 15 overs an hour, if the best bowlers are 4 pacemen and the best batsmen are 6 specialists then so be it, there is part time spin available to break it up.
name one side in the last 10 years he wouldn't walk into, i can only think of india, and maybe pakistan depending on the mushtaq/saqlain/kaneria loveThe inability to bowl 15 overs per hour has come with one, sometimes two, spinners in the side. It's not to do with lack of spinners but neglect of the basic quantity of urgency.
Not really. MacGill was someone who'd have the odd really good game then 4 or 5 bad ones.
and shane warne wasn't ?MacGill was incredible at cleaning up tails. Australia would have killed for him on the third day at Melbourne.
haha, another haddin hater, respectHaddin would probably have found a way to knock the bails off before the ball hit the stumps, or MacGill would've managed to overstep. It seemed Steyn was going to get let-offs regardless on that day.
with boonie and merv in there at the moment it's like a beer tentYes, my frustration is more towards the stupidity of the selectors.
-Chimpdaddy-
Tbh Richard has always been one of the most vocal supporters of Haddin and his ability, even when he was going through that rough phase at the beginning of his career, i think all Rich was trying to say is that Steyn was almost unbreakable that day and and no matter what, a let-off would have come his way one way or the another.haha, another haddin hater, respect
There are plenty of teams whose full-strength seam attacks would make him worthless. You don't need an average wristspinner if you've got good seamers.name one side in the last 10 years he wouldn't walk into, i can only think of india, and maybe pakistan depending on the mushtaq/saqlain/kaneria love
No, not at all. As Sameer has said, I've liked the look of Haddin for a good few years now, was simply quipping that Australia seemed absolutely determined to give Steyn let-offs via whatever means, and that it cost them big-time.haha, another haddin hater, respect
MacGill was a tiger against poor players of spin. But rendered toothless against quality players of spin. He evrages 40+ against both IND and SL, despite bowling on dust bowls. MacGill even in his pomp woudn't have walked in to any Asian side except Bangladesh. If he bowled in FCC in India and SL, he would have got tonked so badly, even his name would have not come sor selection.they seem intent on a spinner though, i think because they have been shown to be completely incapable of bowling 15 overs an hour, i personally would go with a pace battery and some part time spin.
macgill's was better than you give him credit for, not a warne, but would walk into almost any other international team during his peak.
Warne was a beast at it, no doubt, but tail-wiping is one area where I'll give MacGill the edge.and shane warne wasn't ?
He never played either of SL or IND away, did he? All in Australia. Mind you, from memory one of the Tests up in Cairns or Darwin was on a fair turner.MacGill was a tiger against poor players of spin. But rendered toothless against quality players of spin. He evrages 40+ against both IND and SL, despite bowling on dust bowls. MacGill even in his pomp woudn't have walked in to any Asian side except Bangladesh. If he bowled in FCC in India and SL, he would have got tonked so badly, even his name would have not come sor selection.
In comparison Murali, Warne and Kumble kep challenging even the best players of spin. They did not fold up when batsmen stared coming at them
He played 2 against SL in SL and one in Aus as well. In all of them, he got tonked.Played 2 Tests in Sri Lanka in 2003/04, never played them at home. His top-end "Tests" weren't worth the title - they were against Bangladesh.
Doubtful that is. He wouldn't have walked in to Pakistan side if not Saqlain did his knee. But he's better than Kaneria.Not that I'm arguing he would have made an Indian or Sri Lankan side. I think that he could've played for Pakistan at some stage during his career though.
Having just finished Trueman's autobiography, seems county selection (or at least in Yorkshire) was incredibly abysmal in those days, can only imagine what Richard would think of those selectors if what Trueman says is true..though in fairness the book i pretty much a combination of droning on about how it wasn't like it is now in my day and moaning about how was treated by Yorkshire, MCC, the press, the establishment etcYorkshire did have a leggie, Eddie Leadbeater, who was good enough to get a couple of Tests for England in India in 51/52 but the Yorkies lost patience with him in his third season in 52 and that was that
Was interesting talking to a bloke who played Sydney grade cricket with him. Said he was a genius, but the guy admitted himself that he got overawed a bit in Test cricket. And that even in grade cricket, as soon as a guy started getting hold of him, he lost confidence very easily.Ian Salisbury has had many good seasons. He's also had some bad ones, but I'd reckon the good would outnumber the bad, at least before he reached the age of 33 or so.
Are you sure it wasnt the left shoulder dropping which gave the illusion of a higher arm?Yeah those were precisely the criticisms always levelled at Salisbury. That and that his Googly is too easy to pick (arm goes much higher for it), meaning his line (mostly outside off-stump) wasn't that effective against those who could pick his Googly easily.