• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Strange records

BoyBrumby

Englishman
vic_orthdox said:
Most wickets without a 5 wicket haul?

Most wickets without ever taking 10WM?
Dunno about the first, but I'd guess Big, Bad Bob Willis for most wickets without a 10-for. 325 from memory.
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
PhoenixFire said:
First of all, you don't know me, I am a real child in the real world. I'm 14 mate.
Then I'd have hoped that you'd be aware that there are children in this world who have difficulty counting in twos, never mind grasping concepts of time or distance or comparison. Unless of course you've been in a middle-class shelter all your life?
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
BoyBrumby said:
Dunno about the first, but I'd guess Big, Bad Bob Willis for most wickets without a 10-for. 325 from memory.
Correct there - there's a tie for second between Joel Garner and Jason Gillespie (259), while Gough, Lindwall, Streak and Thomson also have 200 or more.
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Neil Pickup said:
Correct there - there's a tie for second between Joel Garner and Jason Gillespie (259), while Gough, Lindwall, Streak and Thomson also have 200 or more.
Most Wickets (no five-for) by country:

Wayne Clark (Aus): 44
Mike Hendrick (Eng): 87
Brian McMillan (SA): 75
Winston Benjamin (WI): 61
Dayle Hadlee (NZ): 71
Rajesh Chauhan (Ind): 47
Wasim Raja (Pak): 51
Don Anurasiri (SL): 41
Guy Whittall (Zim): 51
Mashrafe Mortaza (Ban): 50

Nathan Astle (NZ, 51), Viv Richards (WI, 32) and Joey Carew/Shiv Chanderpaul (WI, 8) hold the records for most wickets without a 4-fer, 3-fer or even a 2-fer respectively.
 

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Neil Pickup said:
Correct there - there's a tie for second between Joel Garner and Jason Gillespie (259), while Gough, Lindwall, Streak and Thomson also have 200 or more.
Add Brett Lee to that list, 200+ wickets without at 10-fer
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
Neil Pickup said:
Then I'd have hoped that you'd be aware that there are children in this world who have difficulty counting in twos, never mind grasping concepts of time or distance or comparison. Unless of course you've been in a middle-class shelter all your life?

First of all, don't you dare try and judge me, for the simple fact that you don't know me. What makes you think that Middle-Class people are all somehow aware that 36 miles is a very long distance.

I am fully aware that there are some severly mentally challenged people and children in this world, my point was, was that any 10 year old kid who is really into cricket, has posted >350 posts on here, has probably got some clue about how far 36 miles is.
 

Tomm NCCC

International 12th Man
andmark said:
W.G Grace once hitted a ball 36 miles.
:laugh: hitted

I found out this the other day that New Zealands Chris Martin

He is the only player, on more than 100 test wickets, to not make more than 50 runs all together in his test career. Incredible.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
Tomm NCCC said:
:laugh: hitted

I found out this the other day that New Zealands Chris Martin

He is the only player, on more than 100 test wickets, to not make more than 50 runs all together in his test career. Incredible.
Yeah heard that on Sky, hilarious :laugh:
 

Tomm NCCC

International 12th Man
PhoenixFire said:
First of all, don't you dare try and judge me, for the simple fact that you don't know me. What makes you think that Middle-Class people are all somehow aware that 36 miles is a very long distance.

I am fully aware that there are some severly mentally challenged people and children in this world, my point was, was that any 10 year old kid who is really into cricket, has posted >350 posts on here, has probably got some clue about how far 36 miles is.
Woah crap, your 14? There's a fact I didn't know you seem 28 to see your posts
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
PhoenixFire said:
First of all, don't you dare try and judge me, for the simple fact that you don't know me. What makes you think that Middle-Class people are all somehow aware that 36 miles is a very long distance.

I am fully aware that there are some severly mentally challenged people and children in this world, my point was, was that any 10 year old kid who is really into cricket, has posted >350 posts on here, has probably got some clue about how far 36 miles is.
Right now you're doing a very good job of straw-man arguing. Where did I say that all middle class children knew how far 36 miles was? Nowhere. So why are you even pretending I'm claiming that? Oh yeah, to suit your own argument.

Can we get back to point a - "Even a severley mentally ******** 10 year old knows that nobody can hit a ball 35 Miles". Your quote. Verbatim. That was what I was picking you up on; not whether andmark genuinely believed it was a 36-mile hit or not.
 

GotSpin

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
PhoenixFire said:
First of all, don't you dare try and judge me, for the simple fact that you don't know me. What makes you think that Middle-Class people are all somehow aware that 36 miles is a very long distance.

I am fully aware that there are some severly mentally challenged people and children in this world, my point was, was that any 10 year old kid who is really into cricket, has posted >350 posts on here, has probably got some clue about how far 36 miles is.
You write like a 35yr old man
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
GoT_SpIn said:
You write like a 35yr old man
Just because somebody is, unlike you, capable of typing without performing a ritual massacre of both the English language and the rules of grammar, doesn't make it writing like a 35-year-old. Some of the most eloquent posters on this site are some of the youngest; it's time you got over yourself.
 

Top