grecian
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hey, if it was inarguable, Cricketweb would only have about 500,000 postsAnil said:murali....inarguably....
Hey, if it was inarguable, Cricketweb would only have about 500,000 postsAnil said:murali....inarguably....
inarguable to any sensible person i meant...grecian said:Hey, if it was inarguable, Cricketweb would only have about 500,000 posts
Top post.Anil said:inarguable to any sensible person i meant...
Haha exactly.Anil said:inarguable to any sensible person i meant...
Haha...um...nah.Anil said:inarguable to any sensible person i meant...
Must've voted the wrong guy?adharcric said:I'll go with the greatest spinner of all-time.
Unfortunately, no ... though I must admit my mouse almost strayed to Laker and Underwood. Your boy does stand a chance if someone has really bad aim with the mouse.KaZoH0lic said:Must've voted the wrong guy?
Take a gander, your vote went to the greatest something else...adharcric said:Unfortunately, no ... though I must admit my mouse almost strayed to Laker and Underwood.
adharcric said:I'll go with the greatest spinner of all-time.
Neither did I.archie mac said:I didn't know we could vote for Bill O'Reilly
Well, after Marshall and Trueman win the opening bowler slots and Sobers wins the # 6 spot, wouldn't Miller, Imran, Botham, Davidson, Hadlee or Lindwall be better "final bowlers"Perm said:Shane Warne for me, the runner up will probably get in as the final bowler anyway.
No.aussie tragic said:Well, after Marshall and Trueman win the opening bowler slots and Sobers wins the # 6 spot, wouldn't Miller, Imran, Botham, Davidson, Hadlee or Lindwall be better "final bowlers"
No.aussie tragic said:Well, after Marshall and Trueman win the opening bowler slots and Sobers wins the # 6 spot, wouldn't Miller, Imran, Botham, Davidson, Hadlee or Lindwall be better "final bowlers"