vic_orthdox
Global Moderator
he'd still probably average less than 30 in test cricket. and it'd be a thicker and stronger lever than what he uses now!
They're not just there for gripping though are they Richard? You must recognise this when differentiating between the two in the first place. It's about the action, and the direction the ball turns, calling Murali a wrist spinner just confuses things.Richard said:Well they come into play, but so do the fingers of any bowler.
I'd like to see a human-being who can grip a cricket ball with no use of his fingers!![]()
Not since the new rules came into force.Richard said:People'd still accuse him of chucking, o'course.![]()
no, because he spins the ball from the off - like all off-spinners. I'm not quite sure why you'd be confused unless, of course, you're advocating a name change everytime a bowler bowls a wrong-un/doosra/legspinner to a left-hander/chinaman to a right-hander/ offspinner to a left-hander etc etc etcRichard said:No, calling him an "off-spinner" just confuses things.
Murali's action quite clearly uses the wrist liberally (and totally differently to any other wristspinner) and the fingers simply to grip the ball, like every bowler ever.
I wonder if he will be able to keep his ERA under 3 in his first year with his new club?social said:Not since the new rules came into force.
But then again, since the adoption of the new rules, Roger Clemens has been signed as an opening bowler for Kent.
He better, or else he'll immediately be labelled "rubbish" by TEC and "worse than Craig White" by RichardFaaipDeOiad said:I wonder if he will be able to keep his ERA under 3 in his first year with his new club?
Although he has shown a great deal of talent in the microphone tapping arena.Pinkline Jones said:Along with the dreadful Anthony Callea, the most irritating short-ar*ed non talents in the business.
At least as talented as that fat sheila that won.Pinkline Jones said:Along with the dreadful Anthony Callea, the most irritating short-ar*ed non talents in the business.
He spins the ball from the off to right-handed batsmen only.Son Of Coco said:no, because he spins the ball from the off - like all off-spinners.
It's judged on stock-balls. Which is why it's silly to classify Saqlain an off-break\leg-break bowler (as Wisden has done) because his stock-ball is an off-break-to-the-right-hander.I'm not quite sure why you'd be confused unless, of course, you're advocating a name change everytime a bowler bowls a wrong-un/doosra/legspinner to a left-hander/chinaman to a right-hander/ offspinner to a left-hander etc etc etc
The same proof that any spinner is not a fingerspinner.I seriously doubt you can prove that Murali doesn't use his fingers to impart spin on the ball like other finger-spinners. Some people seem to have taken the 'flexible wrist' thing and run with it, and while it adds another dimension altogether I'd like to see proof he's not a finger-spinner.
No, people would still claim the new rules are stupid, and instead cling to false ideals.social said:Not since the new rules came into force.
Why are you people confusing things? So you mean that if there is a partnership of a left and right-hander that Giles is bowling to, he's bowling specification will keep changing from Legspin to offspin and vice-versa everytime a single is taken.Richard said:He is if he's bowling at right-handers.