• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official**Zimbabwe in Bangladesh Thread

bryce

International Regular
they really should included manjural islam rana, he is a very talented player with both bat and ball
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
crickmate said:
Ya, Josh, I agree with you. But when you claim yourself an allrounder, you have to be strong either at batting or bowling. While I agree Alok Kapali is a very talented player, but he should be given some time to become more mature. Let him get some big score in local matches and with Bangladesh A team. Then take him back.
Well, apparentely he had been scoring some runs in the "National League" and thats why they picked him.

If all the bowlers had bowled 10 overs, 0/40, Bangladesh would have won comfortably, so Alok's bowling cant be condemned.

I think he needs to be presevered with. Ive always rated him as a possible international standard player, especially with the bat.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Prince EWS said:
If all the bowlers had bowled 10 overs, 0/40, Bangladesh would have won comfortably, so Alok's bowling cant be condemned.
But it doesn't work that way, the more wickets you have remaining the more runs you will get on average.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Unless you listen to the one who ignores everything that's happened in the past because he knows better that is.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Scaly piscine said:
But it doesn't work that way, the more wickets you have remaining the more runs you will get on average.
Not if the bowling is good at the death.

Im not saying that his bowling figures are world class, but they were certainly good, and if Enamul had got them, no-one would be complaining.
 

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
The fact that this weak Zim side can compete equally with Bangladesh , is A really telling indication of where Bangla are in ODIs.

In fact Zim could quite possibly have levelled the away Test series had they played a touch better.
 

Slow Love™

International Captain
JASON said:
The fact that this weak Zim side can compete equally with Bangladesh , is A really telling indication of where Bangla are in ODIs.

In fact Zim could quite possibly have levelled the away Test series had they played a touch better.
Yes, they're not very good. But we knew that already, and I don't see how that takes away from their test series victory. You have to start somewhere, and frequently that will mean beating an ordinary side.

Plus, by beating Zimbabwe, they're doing international cricket a favor.

On an additional note, it looks like the ZCU are getting a little concerned about their "best available lineup":

http://aus.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEWS/2005/JAN/164161_ZIM_22JAN2005.html
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
I still can't work out how Streak was playing Domestic Cricket in Zimbabwe as well as for the FICA "World XI" today.

EDIT: Which was the case until Cricinfo editted their article to make me look silly.
 

bryce

International Regular
zimbabwe make it 2-0, interesting thing for me was that barney rogers got through 10 overs - his previous record in his last 8 ODI's was 9 overs 0 wickets for 72 runs, seems zimbabwe are deveoping quite a few useful all-round cricketers much like NZ(obviously not to the same extent) but they have proved that it is a useful selection policy to have in one-dayers as opposed to making your team up of primarily sepecialists, i'm sure i could of guessed utseya's figures - 10 overs 1/37
 

Chubb

International Regular
Half of all Zimbabwean players are allrounders these days, Rogers, Ewing, Utseya, Hondo (A first-class hundred or 80-odd, can't remember which), Ervine, Blignaut, Keith Dabengwa, Andre Hoffman, Gregg Haakonsen, Matt Townshend, Taibu, Gav Rennie, Grant Flower, Streak, Tawanda Mupariwa, Elton Chigumbura, Stu Matsikenyeri, Hamilton Masakadza ... the list is practically endless.

I think it's born out of the fact most of them learn cricket at school, and schoolboy performance is unpredictable, and also they tend to have the very best, most naturally talented cricketers do a lot for the side.
 
Last edited:

Chubb

International Regular
Yeah I know what you mean. Zimbabwe and NZ are quite small nations in terms of population, whereas India and the rest don't seem to produce too many allrounders, especially not compared to New Zealand. No one makes better use of resources than NZ- are you the least populated test nation? (I really should say "we" now, I filled out my citizenship application this morning.)
 

Neil Pickup

Cricket Web Moderator
Chubb said:
Half of all Zimbabwean players are allrounders these days, Rogers, Ewing, Utseya, Hondo (A first-class hundred or 80-odd, can't remember which), Ervine, Blignaut, Keith Dabengwa, Andre Hoffman, Gregg Haakonsen, Matt Townshend, Taibu, Gav Rennie, Grant Flower, Streak, Tawanda Mupariwa, Elton Chigumbura, Stu Matsikenyeri, Hamilton Masakadza ... the list is practically endless.

I think it's born out of the fact most of them learn cricket at school, and schoolboy performance is unpredictable, and also they tend to have the very best, most naturally talented cricketers do a lot for the side.
That's a pretty loose definition of all-rounder, and one that would run to most International players.
 

bryce

International Regular
Chubb said:
Yeah I know what you mean. Zimbabwe and NZ are quite small nations in terms of population, whereas India and the rest don't seem to produce too many allrounders, especially not compared to New Zealand. No one makes better use of resources than NZ- are you the least populated test nation? (I really should say "we" now, I filled out my citizenship application this morning.)
yeah i don't think any other test playing countries have less than 4 million people - oops should i make that 4 million and one now lol
 

Slow Love™

International Captain
Josh said:
Damn inconsistant Bangladesh!!
LOL.

Looking like another potential victory for Bangladesh today. Zim are 4/94 chasing 244. Taibu's just come to the wicket, and the asking rate is 6.9.
 

Top