• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official Third Test at Edgbaston

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah, cause Cook and Strauss had a terrible test and need replacing.
No. But with the number 3 spot still a problematic area for ENG. If Marcus was still available, Cook could go down the three, thus stabilizing the top order.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
^^ You're mad. You'd drop North when he's scored a century last test because he was dismissed by a gem of an arm-ball from Swann in this test?
Yeah, completely agree. Particularly for Shane Watson, who has done absolutely nothing at test level. There's a logic to playing five bowlers with Haddin at 6, albeit logic I don't agree with. I'd probably be looking at going unchanged- but if Lee is fit, he comes in for Hauritz.
 
Last edited:

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
Will be interesting to see how Jimmy goes in the next match. There's been talk in the past that he's played better when Flintoff isn't there being the 'big important bowler', and today Flintoff bowled continually from one end even though he was injured to 'finish the match off'. I hope I'm worrying over nothing, and that his confidence is still good. After all, his first innings bowling was huge in terms of us winning this match.

Edit: Coincidence or interesting stat?

On a side-note, statsguru is very cool.
 
Last edited:

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No. But with the number 3 spot still a problematic area for ENG. If Marcus was still available, Cook could go down the three, thus stabilizing the top order.
I'm sorry, what? Two opening batsmen, in-form, you shuffle them around to accommodate a bloke who's been out of the Test side for a couple of years and that's a 'stabilising' move?
 

howardj

International Coach
Lee and Watson should both be sent home if they can't play in the next tour game. WIth Clark and MacDonald both woefully underdone also, and no reserve opener, there's a real lack of options for Edgebaston.
 

pasag

RTDAS
Lee and Watson should both be sent home if they can't play in the next tour game. WIth Clark and MacDonald both woefully underdone also, and no reserve opener, there's a real lack of options for Edgebaston.
Call up Dave Hussey if a batsman gets injured before the 4th or 5th Tests?
 

howardj

International Coach
Call up Dave Hussey if a batsman gets injured before the 4th or 5th Tests?
I reckon Hodge would be the best option to come in and do a job straight away.

Not really concerned about our batting so much anyway.
 

pasag

RTDAS
I think Hussey's in town playing county cricket which is a nice backup thought if something goes wrong because our squad is quite batting light.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I reckon Hodge would be the best option to come in and do a job straight away.

Not really concerned about our batting so much anyway.
Yeah but you will be if someone busts a knuckle in the lead up to Edgbaston....
 

howardj

International Coach
Edgebaston, I recall, is the party Test match.

The Sydney New Year's Test is the Aus equivalent.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Pretty sure I've said it before, lest I be accused of talking with the benefit of hindsight, but the make up of the Aussie squad is awful, isn't it? No reserve specialist batsmen, three blokes who're basically competing for the #6 position, two ageing bowlers with v recent injury woes & a reserve keeper who's surely only there in case of Haddin spontaneously combusting on the morning of a test.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
a reserve keeper who's surely only there in case of Haddin spontaneously combusting on the morning of a test.
In fairness, Manou was easily the best choice for the back-up keeper.

I'm with Jack, I don't think there's a need for any panic changes for the next Test. Not so much because they're all playing awesomely but mainly because the other options are a change for the sake of change rather than "**** me, Player X is batting/bowling the house down. We HAVE to pick him somehow." The Lords match essentially came down to one bad batting performance (and it was a stinker). I say, back the guys who are there to come good.
 

howardj

International Coach
In fairness, Manou was easily the best choice for the back-up keeper.

I'm with Jack, I don't think there's a need for any panic changes for the next Test. Not so much because they're all playing awesomely but mainly because the other options are a change for the sake of change rather than "**** me, Player X is batting/bowling the house down. We HAVE to pick him somehow." The Lords match essentially came down to one bad batting performance (and it was a stinker). I say, back the guys who are there to come good.
Agree largely.

However, I'm leaning towards MacDonald for North.

Yes, North would be horribly unlucky, but the team comes first.

I also think Clark is a chance of pushing Siddle out, depending on the Northhampton game.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I can see that. North is definitely one of those blokes who has high highs and low lows. Many suspect he's played his one good knock for the series, probably true. :ph34r: Rarely have I see a bloke look so in-form one day then a tail-ender the next.

Myself, I'd keep Siddle. Even when going for some runs, he poses questions for the batsmen. On a flat deck like Edgebaston, that could be handy.
 

Top