• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official**** Sri Lanka in New Zealand 2014/2015

Flem274*

123/5
Watling was always a keeper through every grade until he happened to get into ND where there were was another keeper in the squad. The idea that "He just picked up the gloves after being a specialist bat" isn't accurate.
Yeah I know both he and AB were youth keepers, but they've still spent years in professional cricket as top or middle order batsmen and it's done wonders for both.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
They are in a way.

Say we required a win in this match to take us to fifth but chasing a win meant we risk losing the game and drawing the series - versus drawing this match means we win the series but remain sixth.

That's why I say "series don't really matter"
That's what I was asking, the ICC predictor isn't loading for me. So it has to be 2-0 is move to 5th?
 

cnerd123

likes this
Yeah, even Prior played quite a bit as a specialist batsman in County Cricket. Shows that nowadays the best method is to get a good batsman and improve their keeping, rather than vice versa.
Ehhhhhh...

I'm a purist. I'd prefer a keeper first who works hard on his batting and has a few good domestic seasons before being picked for Nat level.

Much like spinners, I think keepers need longer to develop and reach their peak in their 30s.
 

Blocky

Banned
That's what I was asking, the ICC predictor isn't loading for me. So it has to be 2-0 is move to 5th?
Nope - drawn match gives us enough points to go to five, although makes it hard for us to get to four against England. If we won this match and won the first match against England, we'd be 4th - if we don't win this match, we need to win both against England.,
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
This is seriously dejavu from last year. Obviously not precisely the same but 1-0 up in the series, 5 down and a deficit... then this happens.
 

Blocky

Banned
This is seriously dejavu from last year. Obviously not precisely the same but 1-0 up in the series, 5 down and a deficit... then this happens.
Yup - which is why I'm worried about anything less than 300. The Basin pitch isn't easy to take wickets on in the final days.
 

Cabinet96

Global Moderator
Ehhhhhh...

I'm a purist. I'd prefer a keeper first who works hard on his batting and has a few good domestic seasons before being picked for Nat level.

Much like spinners, I think keepers need longer to develop and reach their peak in their 30s.
All those guys are good keepers though. I mean, I doubt there's a keeper in the world who'd average 30 in test cricket and be more valuable than someone like Watling. A fractionally better keeper can't make up for someone who can score important centuries and average close to and even above 40.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Even if he gets out now, Watling is the ultimate lieutenant. It's like having a conservative #3 down at #7 who also keeps well.
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
All those guys are good keepers though. I mean, I doubt there's a keeper in the world who'd average 30 in test cricket and be more valuable than someone like Watling. A fractionally better keeper can't make up for someone who can score important centuries and average close to and even above 40.
AB is a bit of a freak though.

Bairstow, for example, is a terrible option IMO. Conversely, I think it was a great move not to encourage Tom Latham to take the gloves.
 
Last edited:

Blocky

Banned
If you're Luke Ronchi - do you give away the gloves in four day cricket? His only chance in tests now is as replacement to 5/6 batsman.
 

Flem274*

123/5
If you're Luke Ronchi - do you give away the gloves in four day cricket? His only chance in tests now is as replacement to 5/6 batsman.
Only if he can also develop the ability to shift down the gears. We know he can attack, but can he do what Kane and Watling have just done?
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
If you're Luke Ronchi - do you give away the gloves in four day cricket? His only chance in tests now is as replacement to 5/6 batsman.
Watling can always be injured. Ronchi is a nice backup option to have.

He should never ever ever make the Test side as a specialist bat.
 

Cabinet96

Global Moderator
AB is a bit of a freak though.

Bairstow, for example, is a terrible option IMO. Similarly, it was a great move not to encourage Tom Latham to take the gloves.
Bairstow has never even excelled as a test batsman bar a couple of fifties though. His struggles aren't an issue of the wrong type of qualities needed, it's simply not being good enough. Watling, Prior, Haddin, de Kock et al are all examples of people who are/were perfectly competent keepers and really good test number 7s.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Nice pulls from Kane and Watling there. Pradeep has been their best bowler and they just said "you're tired and I own you".
 

Top