Loony BoB
International Captain
You're right. I better talk to both Colts & U-19 selectors and get you dropped immediately...Dizzy #4 said:I'm stilly pretty shiity in OD tho! :P

You're right. I better talk to both Colts & U-19 selectors and get you dropped immediately...Dizzy #4 said:I'm stilly pretty shiity in OD tho! :P
Heehee, you chose national geographic, didn't you? :PRobertinho said:Just quietly.. apparently everyone gets their own choice of a 'naughty' movie channel in the hotel. Trav chose Lifestyle Food. Jasotharan chose the Biography channel. His Biography channel. Make of it what you will.
...Travis_Teh said:Heehee, you chose national geographic, didn't you? :P
Mr Mxyzptlk said:2) All players who are 19 years of age as of the end of Season IX are eligible for selection to the Under-19 team once their selection does not clash with selection to the senior side. There will be some instances where U-19 players in the senior side will be allowed to play age level international cricket ahead of CW XI representation, if the CWBCC sees it to be more beneficial to the player to do so.
So you propose we send 2nd string sides on international tours. I know NZ's form hasn't been that good, losing to Nepal and everything, but we should respect them enough to send full strength sides. Also guys like Hancock will learn a lot more from playing with Cunningham, Wilson and Thompson then being the number one all rounder like he is for the Colts.Matteh said:going back to the debate....
I got the impression that those people who were in the full international side or in contention for it weren't going to be picked for the U-19s?
Bangladesh? CWLand is a very young nation with a very small player pool.kears_falcon_9 said:And as for Under 19's not being selected because they are FC regulars. I agree with Marc, there isnt many in real life as REAL regulars but if they are im pretty sure they would play an 'important' game before any under 19 cricket unless it was a world cup.
FaaipDeOiad said:That's rubbish. Look at the recent U-19 WC. Plenty of the players were first class regulars, particularly from the sub-continent nations. Piyush Chawla had first class experience and was called up to the test side a week after the final. Henriques played for NSW in the ING Cup final just after the WC, and played for them before it as well.
Players who were international players would obviously not be called up to play U-19 cricket, but representative junior cricket certainly takes priority over dev league stuff.
Robertinho said:Jasotharan chose the Biography channel. His Biography channel.
AUST_HiTMaN said:Hear Hear.
Batting has been raped, but goodluck to our boys, hopefully they will come back with an older head on their shoulders.
BWA HAHAHAsteds said:
Marc that more an odd occurence then common practise, majority of countries release their players from FC duty for U19 games. In Bangladesh and Zimbabwe all their players basically play FC cricket and they all get released. In Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan half the players if not more play FC cricket and also get released. Even in Australia Cameron White was a regular in the Victorian side before he got released to play for the the U19s in the World Cup.marc71178 said:So how come the likes of Flintoff, Ben Hollioake etc were left out of England home U19 games then?
You see pretty much all of those instances are for the World Cup, not for meaningless tours in between.chaminda_00 said:Marc that more an odd occurence then common practise, majority of countries release their players from FC duty for U19 games. In Bangladesh and Zimbabwe all their players basically play FC cricket and they all get released. In Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan half the players if not more play FC cricket and also get released. Even in Australia Cameron White was a regular in the Victorian side before he got released to play for the the U19s in the World Cup.
You sure about that its every common that players from the sub-continent are taken away from domestic cricket to take part in so called 'meaningless' U19 tours.marc71178 said:You see pretty much all of those instances are for the World Cup, not for meaningless tours in between.
nope, don't think they'd played more than a couple of games before that, as soon as the counties wanted them they left the squad.marc71178 said:Were they actually First Team regulars by that point though?
I know they were playing at the end of the season, but not sure if they were certain picks back in July.