harsh.ag
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That's brilliant !Gavaskar's only Test wicket was Zaheer Abbas.
Gavaskar's only ODI wicket was Zaheer Abbas.
That's brilliant !Gavaskar's only Test wicket was Zaheer Abbas.
Gavaskar's only ODI wicket was Zaheer Abbas.
Ya. Only in ODIs though, it seems.On evidence of this thread, apparently any one could saunter in and dismiss Lara.
that basically means Kohli would win this thread dismissing Chris Martin based purely on criterion 1.On the criteria
1. Rankness of bowler
2. Rankness of delivery
3. Excellence of batsman
4. Excellence of batsman's current innings
Nothing will beat Ranatunga getting Crowe out.
M.S. Dhoni did once get the West Indian No. 4 out bowled in an ODI, only it was not Lara.
Ranatunga was a decent bowler by 1990. Bowled some lively medium pace with banana outswing. It's when he became a filthy fat thing his bowling went down the drain.On the criteria
1. Rankness of bowler
2. Rankness of delivery
3. Excellence of batsman
4. Excellence of batsman's current innings
Nothing will beat Ranatunga getting Crowe out.
M.S. Dhoni did once get the West Indian No. 4 out bowled in an ODI, only it was not Lara.
Lively? Who are you kidding he trundled in and looked every bit the part timer he was. At best he was useful and although I have never looked at this test bowling average on cricinfo I would be surprised if it is less than 50.Ranatunga was a decent bowler by 1990. Bowled some lively medium pace with banana outswing. It's when he became a filthy fat thing his bowling went down the drain.
He was a ODI bowler mainly. Bowled very rarely in the tests because SL had few seamers up their sleeves pre 90s. But in ODIs he did bowl regularly up to early 1990s. It's unfair to say that he was a rank part timer. He was on par with Aravinda with the ball. Probably bowled 120-125k speed. That's lively medium. Don't confuse with lively fast-,medium where the speeds would be 135-140ks.Lively? Who are you kidding he trundled in and looked every bit the part timer he was. At best he was useful and although I have never looked at this test bowling average on cricinfo I would be surprised if it is less than 50.
I see comprehension is not your greatest forte.no wonder sri lanka cant find a seamer when 120 is considered lively.