• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Can NZ cricket ever recover?

Can NZ Cricket recover in next 20 years and be feared side for good duration of time?


  • Total voters
    8

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
WW, I believe you've been warned about this sort of posting before, so please let it go. And Steetwise, Got Spin, etc., just cut the crap. I realise you may have been joking but it's just dragging the thread off topic.
 

wfdu_ben91

International 12th Man
The night after Bravo scored his 100 in Adelaide, one of my mates brothers saw him in a nightclub at around 3am in the morning. That's dedication right there.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
WW, I believe you've been warned about this sort of posting before, so please let it go. And Steetwise, Got Spin, etc., just cut the crap. I realise you may have been joking but it's just dragging the thread off topic.
ok mum :mellow:
 

WindieWeathers

International Regular
WW, I believe you've been warned about this sort of posting before, so please let it go. And Steetwise, Got Spin, etc., just cut the crap. I realise you may have been joking but it's just dragging the thread off topic.
May i ask what i've done wrong? Jono made a claim about WI and i responding to it without any problem, Streetwise then attacks my post so i'm finding it hard to comprehend how i'm to blame here to be honest, in my first response to Streetwise i did say we should disagree and leave it at that.
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
This thread is about NZ cricket, aye? Reading any thread on Cricket Chat gives us your opinion on West Indies cricket. Maybe its time to put on a different record. And Andyc warned Streetwise as well as far as I can tell.
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing


Here we see the trolls in their natural environment. This species has grown quickly with the developments of technology, and now number in the many millions. They transform their habitat from a clean, civil environment into one of muck, filth and bull****, and the air stinks to high heaven. Though there are a team dedicated to eradicating this pest, they continue to multiply in bucketloads, destroying the environment and endangering the natural, sane and intelligent species that now dwell around this absolute mess...
 

WindieWeathers

International Regular
The night after Bravo scored his 100 in Adelaide, one of my mates brothers saw him in a nightclub at around 3am in the morning. That's dedication right there.
Was he downing cristal and surrounded by busty models? if not then he should be ashamed of himself!!.
 

Howsie

International Captain
So about New Zealand :ph34r:

Just remembered that the group of South African's qualify rather soon, around Novemeber iirc. Myburgh from the little I've seen of him will be a welcome addition to our middle order, and maybe in a year or two as will Wagner in the bowling department (although I suspect he'll come right in).

A group of Taylor, Ryder, Williamson, Myburgh, Broom and Guptill doesn't look half bad tbh.
 

WindieWeathers

International Regular
This thread is about NZ cricket, aye? Reading any thread on Cricket Chat gives us your opinion on West Indies cricket. Maybe its time to put on a different record. And Andyc warned Streetwise as well as far as I can tell.
I never came in and posted about WI on a whim though, i responded to someone mentioning WI, there's a big difference.
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I never came in and posted about WI on a whim though, i responded to someone mentioning WI, there's a big difference.
Which, as far as I can understand is why both of you were warned. He took it off topic, but there was no need for you to reply and to continue to drag the thread off topic.
 

WindieWeathers

International Regular
Which, as far as I can understand is why both of you were warned. He took it off topic, but there was no need for you to reply and to continue to drag the thread off topic.
The person i originally responded to (Jono) wasn't warned though, and in that post i also talked about NZ's situation so i think it was perfectly acceptable.

On another topic i think the "troll" line is about as old as Sir David Attenborough himself to be honest, people throw it around when they probably don't even understand what it means.
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
May i ask what i've done wrong? Jono made a claim about WI and i responding to it without any problem, Streetwise then attacks my post so i'm finding it hard to comprehend how i'm to blame here to be honest, in my first response to Streetwise i did say we should disagree and leave it at that.
What Heath said, basically. Yes, others were also involved, and that's why they were warned as well. But when you've been explicitly warned before about taking threads off topic with your postings about the West Indies, it becomes more of an issue. It's okay to be a fan, but not when you're dragging every single thread you post in off topic so that you can talk about the West Indies.



Here we see the trolls in their natural environment. This species has grown quickly with the developments of technology, and now number in the many millions. They transform their habitat from a clean, civil environment into one of muck, filth and bull****, and the air stinks to high heaven. Though there are a team dedicated to eradicating this pest, they continue to multiply in bucketloads, destroying the environment and endangering the natural, sane and intelligent species that now dwell around this absolute mess...
Not needed, Geg.

Any more posts off topic will be deleted and may end in the thread being locked. If anyone wishes to discuss these decisions, then send us an email at moderators@cricketweb.net, but don't discuss it here.
 
Last edited:

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
WW, I'm not sure which part of 'don't discuss it here' you didn't understand, but I've deleted your post. While Heath's post in reply was again quite right, I've deleted that as well as it was also off topic. Any more and the thread will be closed.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
So about New Zealand :ph34r:

Just remembered that the group of South African's qualify rather soon, around Novemeber iirc. Myburgh from the little I've seen of him will be a welcome addition to our middle order, and maybe in a year or two as will Wagner in the bowling department (although I suspect he'll come right in).

A group of Taylor, Ryder, Williamson, Myburgh, Broom and Guptill doesn't look half bad tbh.
Hey, if it's good enough for England... :ph34r:

Seriously tho, I think the surprise is that NZ have been as good as they have for as long as they have. They're a small country in terms of population and, as well as having the best union team in the world they're also the current league world champions and have qualified for the association football WC too, so there's a lot of competition for the sporting talent that's produced.

The Black Caps consistently punch above their weight (particular in the limited overs formats) and every so often will produce some world class talent (your Hadlees, Crowes, Bonds, etc) who will lift their test side into the upper echelons.
 

Flem274*

123/5
So about New Zealand :ph34r:

Just remembered that the group of South African's qualify rather soon, around Novemeber iirc. Myburgh from the little I've seen of him will be a welcome addition to our middle order, and maybe in a year or two as will Wagner in the bowling department (although I suspect he'll come right in).

A group of Taylor, Ryder, Williamson, Myburgh, Broom and Guptill doesn't look half bad tbh.
I'm not convinced on the South Africans tbh. Van Wyk will make a good back up keeper but I'm not sure from what I've seen of Mybrugh (admittedly in List A and 20/20), looks like he could be vulnerable early. Wagner seems ODI specialist material as things stand (his NZ FC record is a bit meh), though I can see him being picked in the test side immediately. Would still rather McKay ahead of him in tests though.

But yeah I can see Myburgh, Taylor, Ryder, Williamson being the order shortly, with Williamson at three ahead of Myburgh if he fails (hopefully with an allrounder with impressive form behind him in his place, even if its not over a big period of time).

Finding that allrounder that can keep the batting going and give the bowling an extra option would be a huge plus. Ideally Franklin would be that man, but I doubt he even thinks he can get back to what he was with the ball and with the bat he is very prone early. If he could transfer a batting average of 35 and his old bowling record he'd be world class, but I doubt it.

There's Vettori of course, but that means we need to pluck a number eight from somewhere. That could be an opportunity for Mills, and in theory his swing bowling would be welcome in a hit the wicket and seam it attack, but I think he's best used as an ODI specialist considering his test...flaws. We can't afford to use a bits and pieces player either, we need as many weapons as we can, even if it weakens the batting.

The bowling attack is the worry. Its not that they aren't up to it, its the lack of variation. If we had one of the current lot whacking it in looking for movement on a good line and length while at the other end a swing bowler was operating (in other words, Southee doing his job) with a left arm seam/swinger to throw the ball to..

As it is, against a really good batting side, once they've faced one, it's not much of a adjustment to face the other two. They will do okay against other sides (they had Australia sweating pre-Clarke) but against the best batting line ups (i.e. India, Australia and SA) they will find it a lot harder I suspect.
 

cbuts

International Debutant
Roll your eyes all you want. The sad truth is that no New Zealand team in history has ever been better than quite good. Even in 85/86 when the Hadlee team was at its peak, they still were only a distant 3rd best in the world (and that was when South Africa was banned).

Still it would be nice to get back to being consistently competitive again. Don't see it happening anytime in the next 2 years though.
Believe NZ were the only team to beat West Indies in a sereis in the 80's

It will take 4 or 5 years. if you look back of the last few decades we were good in the late 80's, 98/88-03/4 we got up to number 3 or so in tests. Taylor, Ryder, Guptil, Williamson should form a key part of our batting lineup for the next decade or more - just need some young bowlers to come through in the next few years and at least one opening batsman!!!
 

cbuts

International Debutant
also, what i dont understand, how can we regularly get 250 v- 300+ in odi's yet struggle to even get 200 in a test... has to be a mental thing at the moment

Whens our next test series? Bangladesh/India late this year?
 

cbuts

International Debutant
:mellow:

I think it's harsh to place us alongside those sides, yes for years we've been a shadow of our former selves but recently we've beaten England and gave Australia a real contest in their own backyard with a depleted team, i might sound biased but i really think our test side is only gonna get better over the next few years, especially with some of the fantastic youngsters coming through.

As for NZ, they've certainly got a few top class test players but unfortunately the rest are just not on the same level which makes them easy pickings for the opposition.
WI havent beaten NZ in a test match since 1995/96.... Only Bangladesh and Zimbabwe can match that record
 

Top