Not especially, no. Stock delivery is quite a full too, so it's not as if he bangs it in back of a length like (say) Flintoff or Nel did. As I said in my first post, it could be his seam movement makes him appear quicker than he registers on the gun.Yep pretty much. Morkel, Freddy and Nel are all tall bowlers who hit the splice often.
Although Philander isn't that tall is he?
Yeah, I always struggled batting against guys who could bowl sharply off a really short run-up. Despite knowing that the ball was coming faster than the run-up/action suggested, I think the brain can't help but react by slowing you down somehow.As a general rule, the faster you run in (with numerous exceptions), the 'lighter' the ball, given a constant bowling speed. Comparison being Simon Jones Vs Mohammad Sami?
And similarly, the opposite effect at international level any time someone absolutely charges in and bowls under 150kph. Person I am mainly looking at is Vinay Kumar. Very few people would consider the reality that he is the same pace as Mcgrath was mainly because Mcgrath ran in and Kumar ****ing charges in.Yeah, I always struggled batting against guys who could bowl sharply off a really short run-up. Despite knowing that the ball was coming faster than the run-up/action suggested, I think the brain can't help but react by slowing you down somehow.
Yeah, I've been beaten for pace numerous times by bowlers with short run ups, while being early on bowlers who charge in off a long run.Yeah, I always struggled batting against guys who could bowl sharply off a really short run-up. Despite knowing that the ball was coming faster than the run-up/action suggested, I think the brain can't help but react by slowing you down somehow.
At club level though, that may be because the bowlers with short run ups are actually quick whereas the bowlers who charge in are kidding themselves. So many factors to consider really.Yeah, I've been beaten for pace numerous times by bowlers with short run ups, while being early on bowlers who charge in off a long run.
Yeah, helps with getting more bounce too which makes it more awkward. If a bloke's seaming it around a bit then you have to play later too, which might create the impression of a 'heavy ball'.Hitting the seam perfectly most of the time has to help.
He used to. when he first started out I used to wonder how an international bowler could get absolutely no movement on a turf wicket. Now he moves it around a bit he seems more intimidating.Watto bowls a light ball. He used to hit 145 and it never looked fast.
But its been said quite a few times that Philander gets it to jump up higher of a normal length for some reason. It's the height of where the ball meets the bat.Not especially, no. Stock delivery is quite a full too, so it's not as if he bangs it in back of a length like (say) Flintoff or Nel did. As I said in my first post, it could be his seam movement makes him appear quicker than he registers on the gun.
Yeah true, we need more player A vs Player B threads along with Indian vs Australian trolling threads.Cricket Web in over-analyzing a long held belief and in so doing making a bigger deal of it than is necessary shocker.
It's not a hard concept though, is it? Surely people know what it means. Only this joint can turn it into a discussion on ****ing physics.Yeah true, we need more player A vs Player B threads along with Indian vs Australian trolling threads.
I saw a Bosun down at Garden Island Navy Base getting a pie at Harry's Cafe de Wheels onceC'mon Burgey, physics rocks and you know it.
Thing is with Nel, he puts a TON of back into his bowling, as does Flintoff.It's an interesting phenomenon alright. Heavy ball exponents I can think of include;
Andre Nel
Brian McMillan
Hamish Bennett
Danny Morrison
Merv Hughes
Andrew Caddick
Andrew Flintoff
and more recently .... Doug Bracewell