• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best(current) commentators

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's incredible the difference in Nicholas when he actually analyses the game. I've heard him in ODD games here and he's picked apart technical aspects of the game very well. By that I don't mean you always agree with what he says, but he cogently went through where he thought a player's weaknesses were, and it was very good. Then the flips the switch to Toss Pot, and everything goes awfully.

I also find it hard to completely despise the bloke who wrote and delivered this at a funeral for a lost friend:

Many years ago, my mother suggested to me, in reference to a splendid school-teacher who had died, that in life one came across only a few truly special people. Lots of good'uns she said, plenty of fabulous folk, but only a few who are special.
Malcolm Marshall, conclusively, was one of those - one of those special people. Not so much because he was so extraordinarily good at cricket, but because of the way in which he applied the various gifts, cricket amongst them, which were given to him. Malcolm was no waster - not of time, not of talent - nor a shirker of any situation or challenge which confronted him.
He maintained excellence without arrogance, earned respect without ever assuming it, and displayed confidence and self-assurance within his immense humility.
For as long as perhaps the last two months, maybe more maybe less, he knew, deep down I think, that the game was up. But he was damned if he would let us know. He was such a stubborn fellow. It was as if he was more concerned about the suffering of those around him, those few intensely close friends kept by this very private man, than about the suffering he was going through himself. The qualities of thoughtfulness and caring, of courage and bravery - and didn't he so often show that in his play - were among his finest. For all the flamboyance and bravado as a sportsman, Malcolm was not one to over-dramatize off the field. He said things as they were and he resolved that his dreadful illness would be his own problem and as it escalated he would not panic others with its potential end.
For everyone who lives here, on this magical island, the name of Malcolm Marshall is synomomous with the style of the place: with the game of cricket in its purest calypso form, but also in its more modern professional form; with fun and sun; with the good and simple living that is typical here; and with the honesty and generosity of spirit that characterizes the people of Barbados. It is clear to a visitor his loss has stunned his nation.
And yet, most fascinatingly, amazingly really, his loss has echoed all around the world, volley upon volley of shock stabbing at friends and fans wherever the game is treasured. The internet, for example, is jammed with messages and memories and telephone lines have been on heat. Among the first calls I received were from Shaun Pollock, in Natal, South Africa, who attributes so much of his success to Malcolm; from Barry Richards, the great South African batsman, living now in Australia; from Martin Crowe, who called him "the finest opponent of them all - furious but fair and fantastic value in the bar"; and Ian Botham, busy on his final walk raising millions of pounds for Leukaemia Research, who for once found himself virtually unable to speak, so sad was he not to say goodbye to "the skinny wimp from the Windies" as he loved to call him.
It was funny to watch opponents greet Macho. The greats, his peers, relished the moment with hand-slapping glee and then they all tore the life out of each other on the pitch. The less good used to whisper among themselves if he was late, as he often was incidentally - wouldn't you be with Connie at home ! - saying "no sign of Macho today ? phew !" Then, when he arrived, wrapped in gold chains and fancy clothes - and boy did he dress snappy or what - their faces would fall. Ray East and David Acfield, the Essex county spinners, and terrified tail-enders, used to wait by his car and offer to carry his bags to the dressing room. "Why ?" asked Malcolm, when it first happened. "Well, Mr Marshall, we thought you might consider a couple of half volleys and if they're are nice and straight we promise to miss them !"
It is an amazing phenomena of his short life that opponents everywhere, from Barbados to Bombay, from Sydney to Southampton, loved him so. Let's face it, he was a lethal bowler - that skidding bouncer homed in on its target like a Scud missile - and a brilliantly, skillful bowler capable of all kinds of swing and cut and subtle changes of pace. But, of course, he was revered after play when he drank his beloved brandies, when his sharp mind chewed the cud of the game and when he boasted his batting exploits - how he rejoiced in batting !
He loved talking cricket, he knew it so well and people listened to his strong opinion, his deep insight and his remarkable ability to explore the game's present and future with uncanny foresight. He had time for everyone after play, in the mornings before play too, when he would share the secrets of his success equally with anyone, friend or foe. Pollock, Lance Kulsener, Dominic Cork and Chris Cairns are among those who lapped at his advice. Imran Khan, who calls Malcolm the greatest of all fast bowlers, learned the leg-cutter from him. Malcolm, in turn, had learnt it from Dennis Lillee. Theirs was the Fast Bowlers Union and how he loved to share the nuances and stories of the spoils with all-comers.
So far then, we have a universally loved and respected character who is unselfish and warm, and a man of supreme skill.
But we mustn't forget his sense of humour, the extravagant plans for each batsman and those often hysterical, detailed field settings.
And then he would turn up his collar and swagger away, job done clinically yet with such flair. That swagger, the swaying of the hips, the brim of the sunhat tilted forwards, the collar pointing to the sky were all a result of his adoration of Sir Garfield Sobers, whose hundred against New Zealand at the Kensington Oval in 1972 was the definitive moment in the thirteen-year old Malcolm's dream to reach the top. He wanted to BE Sobers. "Come on Sobey, come and have a bowl", Clive Lloyd would sometimes say years later and in would stroll this languid, almost liquid cricketer, immaculate every inch of the way even when dripping with the sweat of his efforts.
Not much got the old boy's back up, though you didn't dare meddle with his cricket case or nick a T-shirt from his wardrobe - blimey, you would have thought an atomic bomb had gone off if he found anything out of place, so neat and tidy were clothes and kit. And he didn't like sloppiness from cricketers, or from people in general in fact and certainly didn't suffer indifference from anyone; and he couldn't stand bad manners. Oh, and he liked to get his own way, but then don't we all. And you know why these things frustrated him ?
Because he cared. He cared about standards, about commitment to the chosen cause, about quality in all things. Joel Garner once said that "Malcolm's real strength is that he never gives less than 100 per cent for any team in which he plays or is involved." Even to the end, before his operation, he would be bowling in the nets, inswing and outswing, appeals and exasperation, smiles and scowls and so much joy.
That's Macho for me. A man of joy and delight in all he did and in others around him. The endless chatter, that laughter with his head thrown skywards, those dancing happy eyes and that welcoming ripper of a smile. And the unbridled enthusiasm for a determined march on all the challenges of life - didn't matter what they were, simple things even such as a round of golf, a hand of backgammon, a night on the town - all met with relish and hope.
He is gone now and of course we're sad. We're heartbroken. But he is a man we MUST celebrate for he gave life all that he had and from him came an unforgettable warmth and always a sense of direction. The Hampshire captain of the Sixties, Colin Ingleby-Mackenzie, said last week "We can only assume the great Maestro in the sky was short of a class all-rounder." Not only does the Maestro in the sky have with him a great all-rounder, but in Malcolm he has the greatest enthusiasm for the game I have known. They will probably be having a party together right now, as we must in time, in his honour. Let's be honest, he'd hate us not to smile from within each time we think of him - the Marshall Memory really is one to treasure.
Malcolm always referred to himself as "a lucky man". Well, we're the lucky ones, to have known him. What a privilege it has been.
 

GirtBySea

U19 12th Man
athers is in an absolute league of his own these days, be it behind the mic or with the pen.

absolutely despise nicholas. will you guys down there just give him a ****ing passport already.
Mark "Look At Me" Nicholas seems to be running his own show, doing the coin toss, the interviews and the hosting role. ****.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member

ohnoitsyou

International Regular
To be fair, that was in 1990, when Mugabe was the poster child for racial reconciliation (and the world media was happily ignoring Mugabe's brutal suppression of Zimbabwe's Ndebele minority), so it's not surprising that Nicholas would behave that way.
call it for what it was: genocide.
 

Marius

International Debutant
To be fair, that was in 1990, when Mugabe was the poster child for racial reconciliation (and the world media was happily ignoring Mugabe's brutal suppression of Zimbabwe's Ndebele minority), so it's not surprising that Nicholas would behave that way.
call it for what it was: genocide.
Yeah, it was a genocide. But Bahnz is right, in 1990 the world was lining up to kiss Mugabe's arse.

And the only reason there is any focus on Mugabe in the West is because he kicked white farmers off their land. If he'd left the whites alone Mugabe wouldn't have been demonised like he is now.

Come on, Barack Obama recently hosted a US-Africa summit and invited most of the continent's leaders. Mugabe wasn't there, but Obama was more than happy to have a photo-op with Obiang of Equatorial Guinea, who is, on every measure, far worse than Mugabe.
 

jcas0167

International Debutant
There are three different reasons to enjoy a commentator IMO, the primary focus for a lot of CWers is seemingly cricket analysis. The second is banter, where you are enjoying the commentator for their own "action" rather than what they are lending to the game itself. I personally enjoy quality banter a lot and always look forward to commentary duos or trios that interact in an amusing way. A quick example of this would be about 2-3 years ago, Doully and Richardson were overall poorer in the commentary box than they are now, but when paired together turned into a cheerleader of bowling vs. a cheerleader of batting. Regardless of who was on the field at the time, the line was drawn for those two at who had the ball and who was holding the bat. It was always worth a chuckle.
The third and probably least important is the sound of their voice. Some people are easier to listen to just by the tone and mannerisms they have when speaking. I remember Michael Holding singing me sweetly to sleep many times while watching England home Tests a few years back.

So where do you ****s put your priorities?

I'm all about the banter, and probably see cricket analysis and the voice about equal as a secondary factor in my enjoyment of cricket commentary.
The banter is definitely important. Tony Grieg and Bill Lawry were excellent. I haven't listened to it this season, but I used to enjoy the ABC radio commentary with the likes of Geoff Lawson, Damien Fleming, Jim Maxwell, Peter Roebuck (RIP) and Kerry O'Keefe. Those guys were first rate and had quite contrasting styles.

In New Zealand I enjoyed Glenn Turner's dry analysis, but unfortunately he obviously wasn't in favour with Crowe or Smith. Jeremy Coney is excellent and Crowe himself was good when he wasn't trying to imitate Graham Hughes (Danny Morrison seems to have perfected that). Richard Petrie was very good on radio in the recent Sri Lanka series.

I heard Michael Vaughan commenting on radio at the 2011 WC and thought he was superb. Atherton & Hussein also stand out.
 

Debris

International 12th Man
Greigy and lawry were so awesome
It is weird how the passage of time transforms disgust into fondness. They were atrocious. The Ian Healy and Mark Nicholas of the 80s and 90s. Provided no insights into the game and spent most of their time squabbling and trying to one-up each other.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
They also always had an obviously instructed good cop bad cop routine... One seasont would be Lawry sticking up for the visitors and the next season it would be Greig...
 

Top