A plea for non-discrimination

[Flem274*]

Morgie, don't call out members by name thanks. It's only going to create a mess. I'm editing your post to avoid you getting flamed.

 

[smash84]

Thank you Flem and I really don't appreciate the accusation that morgieb is throwing around.

@morgieb..... If you had any issues you should have reported my posts or should have contact me.

I won't say that I have not made comments in jest in a lot of threads but this is actually the first time that I have been accused of trolling.

 

[Flem274*]

Smiley, unless I'm missing something really obvious, he didn't use your name..

 

[Spark]

See, trolling/being dickheads is all well and good between mates, but when you have nationalistic rivalries and the natural passions that arises, it can become far less good-natured.

 

[Daemon]

Anyone who thinks smileyshah is a troll needs their head examined. (Don't think he was referring to you btw)

 

[smash84]

Smiley, unless I'm missing something really obvious, he didn't use your name..

he posted right under my post and didn't quote anybody and said you, so what am I supposed to infer from that?

 

[Prince EWS]

he posted right under my post and didn't quote anybody and said you, so what am I supposed to infer from that?

Haha he didn't me you; he meant who he said. Where he said "you, X and Y", read it as "you: X and Y" instead.

 

[Flem274*]

he posted right under my post and didn't quote anybody and said you, so what am I supposed to infer from that?

I see what you're saying now. Nah he didn't mean like that. He said "you" followed by the names as in "I'm looking at you; Tim and Jill," while looking pointedly in their direction. Tim and Jill are the "you."

 

[smash84]

Haha he didn't me you; he meant who he said. Where he said "you, X and Y", read it as "you: X and Y" instead.

I see what you're saying now. Nah he didn't mean like that. He said "you" followed by the names as in "I'm looking at you; Tim and Jill," while looking pointedly in their direction. Tim and Jill are the "you."

my bad.....sorry

 

[Bun]

While GF should've banned and was clearly trolling, I tend to think that he's not the only one.

I think bun has a buttload of infractions already tbh. He's hinted so himself at times.

He got an 8-pointer and that wasn't enough to get him a ban, so he can't have had many in the last few months.

Morgie, don't call out members by name thanks. It's only going to create a mess. I'm editing your post to avoid you getting flamed.

 

[GIMH]

I wasn't calling you out. You said yesterday you'd received an 8-pointer, I was just commenting on that.

 

[Bun]

I wasn't calling you out. You said yesterday you'd received an 8-pointer, I was just commenting on that.

No, am just curious how suddenly it became a discussion on me

 

[Spark]

Well, now it isn't.

 

[Burgey]

I don't think so. I might be missing it for reasons I have stated, but considering the recent reactions of neutral posters that aren't prejudiced against either team, I'm inclined to believe that it's not an equal give and take like what you make it to be.



I agree that the example you provide should not be grounds for infarction, but I wouldn't for one second pretend that that's representative of the instances that have led to a couple of recent bannings. Those were clearly a build up of posts deliberately designed with intention to provoke.

Agree. Not worth having a heart attack over.

 

[Burgey]

Although I agree with the Tang man that Tendulkar shouldn't get absolute protection from any negative words, it was clear as day Furball had been deliberately trolling Indian fans for ages. I remember reading a post of his basically saying Tendulkar was **** because he never makes runs under pressure and basically is a downhill skiier.

Now that's either one of two things. It's either an obvious troll or just an absolutely bat **** stupid post. Either way we don't want those types of posts on here.

Same for you talking about Goodes in the AFL thread, ****

 

[benchmark00]

Nah ****, infracting me for that would be like infracting someone for posting 'the sky is blue' or 'Jono is a ****'.

 

[Spikey]

have we reached a conclusion here? Can I call Sachin a ****ing **** **** who is **** under pressure and is a ****ing flat track bully without fear?

 

[Spikey]

****

 

[Hurricane]

have we reached a conclusion here? Can I call Sachin a ****ing **** **** who is **** under pressure and is a ****ing flat track bully without fear?

Yes to the ***** under pressure
Sometimes to the flat track bully
Maybe to the ****ing ****

 

[smash84]

have we reached a conclusion here? Can I call Sachin a ****ing **** **** who is **** under pressure and is a ****ing flat track bully without fear?