• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Group 2 (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Netherlands)

anil1405

International Captain
Agreed. 16 minimum really - it’s a T20. Takes one or two bad overs for the entire thing to swing. Worth getting some smaller teams in there to cause upsets from time to time.
This particular edition was gun.

If I'd change anything then it would be having two groups of six in qualifiers instead of four.

Rest all stays the same.
 

Shri

Mr. Glass
with kohli back in good touch, india would chase borderline totals without drama in the SF and F if it goes that way

can't say the same about any other side atm
 

White Ball

State 12th Man
Just wondering if it may be better for india to play a semi in Sydney? Could well suit the spinners more.

Its good to be in a position to hand qualified already and effectively decide where you get to play your semi!
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
TV networks require them to say that sort of thing, true story.
Yeah, remember an anecdote from Nicholas when he’d just joined the C9 commentary team. It was a random game where Australia needed about 40 to win from 10 overs. Nicholas said on the air that the match was over and Kerry Packer absolutely reamed the commentary team for it after the game.
 

Top