*Official* First Test at The Gabba

[GuyFromLancs]

Actually some of our bowlers have had success in the past against england, so therefore we will dominate

Well, I don't know about anyone else, but I'm convinced.

 

[Maximas]

Who?? How many of them have played in a winning Ashes series???

twas a satirical post about how GuyFromLancs is always ready to talk up England on past performance that is not necessarily relevant or much good, but in all seriousness our bowlers have all had their days, in the away series it wasn't their fault we lost 3 zip

 

[Spark]

Who?? How many of them have played in a winning Ashes series???

Generally speaking bowlers are judged on their bowling.

 

[Burgey]

Well, I don't know about anyone else, but I'm convinced.

He's using your own misguide sense of logic against you

Guy, I want to congratulate you. I've been on here since 2006 and despite running the whole gamut of the Precam multis, Dickinson at his worst and people like Migara I've never used the ignore feature, because every now and again when you flush the brasco something other than a pile of **** turns up. I still don't intend to use it, but from here on I'm going to make like a Jewish feast where you're concerned and pass over.

 

[GuyFromLancs]

twas a satirical post about how GuyFromLancs is always ready to talk up England on past performance that is not necessarily relevant or much good, but in all seriousness our bowlers have all had their days, in the away series it wasn't their fault we lost 3 zip

But all good past performances from England count, but none of the guff ones. Whilst all Australia's failures count double, whilst any relative success is ignored.

That's the GFL formula (c)

 

[GuyFromLancs]

He's using your own misguide sense of logic against you

Guy, I want to congratulate you. I've been on here since 2006 and despite running the whole gamut of the Precam multis, Dickinson at his worst and people like Migara I've never used the ignore feature, because every now and again when you flush the brasco something other than a pile of **** turns up. I still don't intend to use it, but from here on I'm going to make like a Jewish feast where you're concerned and pass over.

*****

 

[howardj]

Ben Dorries
Sir Joh
Hansen
Palmer
Newman
Rudd
No daylight saving

Hard to mount a defence

 

[howardj]

Barnaby too

 

[Burgey]

*****

You should go chasing some.

 

[Burgey]

Ben Dorries
Sir Joh
Hansen
Palmer
Newman
Rudd
No daylight saving

Hard to mount a defence

Was gonna say Tony Carroll, but, well you know...

 

[GuyFromLancs]

You should go chasing some.

Sorry, Burgey. I thought people were here for a bit of a laugh and a chat.

Sure I show bias. But I'm more than ready to admit it, and admit to getting things wrong.

If you want to throw your toys out, then so be it.

 

[Maximas]

It's just impossible to have a reasonable conversation with you, and not many others (if any at all) are like that here

 

[Burgey]

Sorry, Burgey. I thought people were here for a bit of a laugh and a chat.

Sure I show bias. But I'm more than ready to admit it, and admit to getting things wrong.

If you want to throw your toys out, then so be it.

Show all the bias you like mate, it's not uncommon. We all do it. But it's just I haven't actually read a single post from you that's added a sliver of anything to a thread. Not one thing.

I wouldn't know what you know about cricket because you've wrapped your head up so tight in the Union Jack then stuck it so far up your own cloaca it's like some form of autoerotic asphyxiation for you. And you can do that, it's fine. Odious, tedious and repulsive but fine.

But I just cbf reading it.

I mean Corrin is a biased ****, FJ too. But they're happy to have a reasoned discussion about the game which goes beyond "England good; Australia bad".

I'm not saying you can't do it, I'm not saying you shouldn't do it. And I'm not saying you're a bad bloke. For all I know you might be the nicest bloke in the world. All I'm saying is what you're posting isn't worth a squirt of piss to me in terms of advancing the discussion. So I'm planning on ignoring it if I can.

It's only my opinion of course. It's just you're the English version of some Victorian ****wit we had on here last year who carried on with this flag waving bull****, and he copped short shrift too (what was that ****'s name, I can't remember?).

Im not trying to censor you (it's not my place and I wouldn't even if it was), I'm just going to try and censor your posts from my eyes to stop them bleeding.

Have a good day.

 

[GuyFromLancs]

Show all the bias you like mate, it's not uncommon. We all do it. But it's just I haven't actually read a single post from you that's added a sliver of anything to a thread. Not one thing.

I wouldn't know what you know about cricket because you've wrapped your head up so tight in the Union Jack then stuck it so far up your own cloaca it's like some form of autoerotic asphyxiation for you. And you can do that, it's fine. Odious, tedious and repulsive but fine.

But I just cbf reading it.

I mean Corrin is a biased ****, FJ too. But they're happy to have a reasoned discussion about the game which goes beyond "England good; Australia bad".

I'm not saying you can't do it, I'm not saying you shouldn't do it. And I'm not saying you're a bad bloke. For all I know you might be the nicest bloke in the world. All I'm saying is what you're posting isn't worth a squirt of piss to me in terms of advancing the discussion. So I'm planning on ignoring it if I can.

It's only my opinion of course. It's just you're the English version of some Victorian ****wit we had one here last year who carried on with this flag waving bull****, and he copped short shrift too (what was that ****'s name, I can't remember?).

Im not trying to censor you (it's not my place and I wouldn't even if it was), I'm just going to try and censor your posts from my eyes to stop them bleeding.

Have a good day.

I'm pretty sure my entire outlook isn't England good Australia bad.

So far I've predicted a mere 2-1 to England.

That Clarke may top the runs

That Warner will be the find of the series.

And no doubt numerous other stuff.

So a hearty **** you, you ****

 

[Pothas]

Well this is fun.

 

[GuyFromLancs]

It's just impossible to have a reasonable conversation with you, and not many others (if any at all) are like that here

I'm happy to talk about any cricketing subject with anyone, without a hint of ad hominem.

Think for yourself instead of jumping on Burgey's bandwagon, kid!

 

[Spikey]

you stupid users can try all you like but you can't ruin this great day. peter nevill captain of nsw. what a time to be alive

 

[GuyFromLancs]

No problem.

I'm back Mr Nice Guy again.

 

[Shri]

He's using your own misguide sense of logic against you

Guy, I want to congratulate you. I've been on here since 2006 and despite running the whole gamut of the Precam multis, Dickinson at his worst and people like Migara I've never used the ignore feature, because every now and again when you flush the brasco something other than a pile of **** turns up. I still don't intend to use it, but from here on I'm going to make like a Jewish feast where you're concerned and pass over.

Been a while since you went on a rant. Figured you had gone soft. Refreshing. 10/10.

 

[sledger]

This thread is great. Just what I was hoping to see upon returning from my ban.