he can always write a sequel...I'd be interested to read more about what happened here...too bad KP's already done his autobiography.
Why write one before your career's over?
True, although in fairness there's a hell of a lot more talent in SA than English cricket. I mean they'll normally grant anyone from overseas citizenship, most classic example being Pattinson.SA are in a better position than England to turn down players they don't like. Just say the SA middle order in four years looks like this: Amla, Prince, De Villiers, Duminy. Which of those players do you tell to shift to make room for the prodigal son?
.
You be correct there, I stand corrected. For some reason I thought he was Aussie-born.Pattinson is English
You be correct there, I stand corrected. For some reason I thought he was Aussie-born.
Just journalists, AFAIK. They never liked him ITFP so were never likely to miss the chance to paint him in a bad light when he painted them in a bad light.didn't Fletcher's autobiography leave a sour taste in some of the players' mouths?
Pattinson isn't English, he's just England-born. He lived in Australia for 23 years between the ages of 6 and 29. That in my book makes him Australian and nothing but Australian. Where you were born is irrelevant; what matters is where you've been.Pattinson is English
Overreaction of the century to be perfectly honest. Its not he's not going to play for England again, he just won't be captain, which I'm not convinced he was that suitable anyway, but just the best man at the time.I am distraught
His younger bother is!
Shame really... isn't he supposed to be a pretty good young talent?As long as he's not English!
Funny, you know, Bob Willis was mentioning the "packs" (I think "cliques" is a deliberately negative-insuating term in a way that's plain wrong) of the England team yesterday. The likes of Vaughan, Trescothick, Collingwood and Strauss were all big Duncan Fletcher men; Flintoff and Harmison were apparently less keen on him, so were a bit more welcoming of Peter Moores. Now Pietersen has been so obviously derogatory about Moores, they were never exactly likely to take kindly to that, were they?Most of the English press are reporting that it was 'Flintoff who got Pietersen sacked'.
Headlines are a bit sensationalist but it looks like Flintoff did contribute as when opinions, of the players, where asked of Pietersen's captaincy by the ECB Flintoff & his 'supporters' where extremely negative.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-1108901/Flintoff-leads-mutiny--Pietersen-forced-team-mates.html
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article5470204.ece
If you're being distraught about losing a year or (at best) two of (mostly irrelevant) ODI-playing from such a bowler, it's a little worrying."Distraught" is being a New Zealand fan who lose the only world class pace bowler they've had for over 20 years to the ICL never to play again.
Doesn't this completely contradict the fact that you consider yourself Welsh?Pattinson isn't English, he's just England-born. He lived in Australia for 23 years between the ages of 6 and 29. That in my book makes him Australian and nothing but Australian. Where you were born is irrelevant; what matters is where you've been.
All extraordinarily unhealthy.Funny, you know, Bob Willis was mentioning the "packs" (I think "cliques" is a deliberately negative-insuating term in a way that's plain wrong) of the England team yesterday. The likes of Vaughan, Trescothick, Collingwood and Strauss were all big Duncan Fletcher men; Flintoff and Harmison were apparently less keen on him, so were a bit more welcoming of Peter Moores. Now Pietersen has been so obviously derogatory about Moores, they were never exactly likely to take kindly to that, were they?
Yep, he's pretty highly rated as a young cricketer. He's only played one (IIRC?) First Class game and I haven't seen him at all yet but he's certainly getting a bit of a reputation as someone to watch.Shame really... isn't he supposed to be a pretty good young talent?