Last edited by weldone; 20-03-2017 at 06:00 AM.
"Cricket is an art. Like all arts it has a technical foundation. To enjoy it does not require technical knowledge, but analysis that is not technically based is mere impressionism."
- C.L.R. James
Nice work. The list is very similar to cricrate since my update to handle home/away and reduce jumpiness:
cricrate | Current Ratings - Test Team
(Mine isn't updated with Ind v Aus and ban vs SL yet)
I'm in the process of scraping series status data - wondering if I should adjust for deciders/dead rubbers..
I first looked into the ICC rankings in 2008, working out their own ratings back to 1877 which was posted on Howstat's website (since taken down). Actually it was that feature which got my writing for CW.
In 2010 I looked at improving their ratings, modifying them to account for a) success away from home and b) degree of dominance, which I based on RPW:-
Improving the ICC Test Team Rating System | Cricket Web
I always thought the ICC system had another flaw in it where they base their ratings on a period of time. South Africa, as good as they were in the 1960s, only played two series, not enough to justify a number 1 ranking. If only they played the West Indies around 1966, what a series that would have been!
In my system, your series score is added onto your ranking, which then either increases or decreases. There is no period limit. Series scores are adjusted by opposition and home/away. Adding in RPW difference was a little problematic, do I left it out. After all, winning by an innings but losing by one wicket in the next match will give you a 1-1 scoreline, which is what people will remember.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)