I hate to puncture the smug worldly opinion you have of yourself but John Howard has been retired since 2007. So he couldn't have been involved in this incident in any way. Neither was his party by the way. The restaurant owner has admitted it was he who wrote up the menu as a private joke. The menu wasn't disseminated at the fund raiser and only got out to the public via a series of events facilitated on a private facebook page. At this stage you'd be thinking you might apologise or retract. For some reason admitting error isn't a virtue of the smug so your embarrassed silence will serve as an adequate substitute.
When you claim boorish politicians and chavs/bogans are a peculiarity of one people instead of a common failing in all countries then yes; yes you can say it is racist.
1. What difference does it make when Howard retired? I'm well aware that he hasn't been involved in politics for a long time, and despite your sneaky attempt to suggest otherwise, I nowhere accused him of direct involvement in the incident. But the fact of the matter is that the incident involved members of his party who are clearly carrying on in his oafish tradition, and that is why it forced me to associate the name of the oaf-in-chief and his present-day successors .
2.
Yahoo! News UK & Ireland - Latest World News & UK News Headlines
With respect to the restaurant owner's belated "admission", firstly, the account I read makes it clear that this latest incident is just the latest in a series showing a pattern of ***ist and misogynistic behaviour by the (so-called) Liberals against Gillard. Secondly, "wrote up the menu as a private joke" sounds to me like someone sacrificing himself to get some powerful customers out of a jam. I'm not convinced, but, even if it were true, it would make absolutely no difference to the point I was making. Which is that, regardless of whether or not the menu was approved by party officials, the fact that whoever was responsible for the hilarious "joke" believed that it lay within the pale of acceptability, and would even be appreciated by leading Australian politicians, speaks to the extent to which your bogan problem eclipses that of any other nation I can think of. In a civilized country no one outwith the sorts of characters one sees depicted in TV shows like Underbelly would assume that such a crude and completely tasteless "joke" would be acceptable in some sort of formal setting. No one. Yes, perhaps one might here and there come across such 'humour' between mates on a fishing trip, or having a drink after rugby, or whatever. But in a room full of people wearing suits and ties? No way! If that's typical aussie humour, then you guys need to take tips from the Germans.
3. You clearly do not undertand what racism is. That you disagree with my view that your chavs/bogans refresh the parts that other countries' chavs/bogans cannot reach is one thing; that you extrapolate from that that my point of view is therefore racist is absurd and illogical. I have already made it clear that I accept that all countries have this class of person, and that I'm not judging Oz becuase it has bogans or ockers or whatever. If anything our chavs are, as someone who's seen them on holiday in the mediterranean has pointed out, are far worse! But I have also backed up what I'm actually saying, which is that Australia's problem is that its chavism is not confined to the 'lower orders' - by giving a number of examples, and not just involving politicians ;-) In Australia sadly this class of person and this type of behaviour is not confined to awful slums, inner city dumps or backward rural areas but is actually embodied in 'respectable' persons with supposedly responsible jobs. Rather than playing the victim by whining (all too predictably) about my supposed anti-Aussie racism(!) ;-), why not come out with similar examples of non-chav people in the UK behaving in similar ways. I suspect you'll be hard-pressed to do so because, as I intimated earlier, the chav ethos has not permeated throughout the society in this country as it has in Oz.
As I've already said to another poster, it's a shame that you seem to feel I'm picking on Australia, rather than pointing out an uncomfortable truth. The day I heard about the prank call to the hospital, the day I read about the incident on the bus involving the French tourists, the day (today) I read about the menu item, I immediately recalled what my Australian friends have told me about your country. It is clear that they are not isolated incidents, but part of a pattern. Rather than getting defensive and even excusing such behaviour you need to be looking for ways of eradicating it if you want to develop, enrich and extend civilized discourse in your beautiful country.