• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Players who are exceptional in one format and dire in another

Maximas

Cricketer Of The Year
Playing half your home games on the WACA would also sap your will to live as a spinner.

Averages mid-30's away from Perth, fair bit less than his overall FC average. Reckon that would compare favourably to the vast majority of left-arm wristies. It's a tough art.
Especially given he has no height to work with, Hogg's main strength was deception, and he really needed a bit of turn for batsmen to be challenged by him. He also greatly benefited from batsmen who were trying to get him away, which was more common in ODI cricket.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
RE: Hogg, have brought it up before on the forum, but remember people talking about his wrong'un being a lot easier to pick with the red ball than the white one, with the scrambled seam harder to pick up on the white pill.
 

Expressway76

U19 Vice-Captain
RE: Hogg, have brought it up before on the forum, but remember people talking about his wrong'un being a lot easier to pick with the red ball than the white one, with the scrambled seam harder to pick up on the white pill.

Yeah his wrong-un was deadly in ODI games (especially against England but then when hasn't it been?).
 

BeeGee

International Captain
The choice to use the word 'exceptional' has ruined this thread.
No. :p

If people want to discuss players who were "decent in one format and dire in another" that's fine, but that's a reasonably common phenomena. I was after those players with a ludicrous contrast in performance.
 
Last edited:

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
No. :p

If people want to discuss players who were "decent in one format and dire in another" that's fine, but that's a reasonably common phenomena. I was after those players with a ludicrous contrast in performance.
Haha fair enough.
 

zaremba

Cricketer Of The Year
Mike Yardy played T20 internationals, more or less as a specialist bowler, despite a first class bowling record of 28 wickets in 162 matches at an average of 74.21.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Roger Twose - at one stage was rated no 2 ODI batsmen in the world behind Bevan (2000), but only averaged 25 in tests
 

BeeGee

International Captain
Roger Twose - at one stage was rated no 2 ODI batsmen in the world behind Bevan (2000), but only averaged 25 in tests
Had a critical weakness to short balls delivered at his body and head. In his last few innings he would walk to the crease looking like the Michelin Man, due to the amount of protective padding he was wearing.
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
Abdur Razzak

The closest thing Bangladesh has to a world-class specialist bowler in ODIs, with 201 wickets @ 28 (ER under 4.5)
18 wickets in Tests (2 per match) @ 66
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The Twose situation always fascinats me. I was only like 9 when he retired and only remember a few innings of his, (him blasting us at the '99 world cup), but I've always wanted to find out more about the guy and how there was such a difference between his really good ODI record and his abysmal test record. It wasn't really like a Bevan thing I imagine. Pity there's no youtube footage of Twose

Graeme Hick had a really impressive ODI record and though I wouldn't call him dire, was pretty underwhelming in tests as wel all know

Malcolm Marshall also has a tame ODI bowling record compared to his test stats for some weird reason
 
Last edited:

Top