Edit: The bowling conditions were not the greatest in the WI if i remember correctly, but we should get a look at him in one of the tests
Last edited by ohnoitsyou; 21-12-2012 at 08:50 PM.
Both of these players coming along very nicely..................
And I dare say some of those calling Starc trash earlier in thread might be a little more quiet, he's probably one of the best short format bowlers in the world at present.
No-one was calling Starc trash iirc, they just said he had bowled plenty of trash up to that stage which was true.
Exit pursuing a beer
Shiny new toy for Boult; swinging it both ways now. It'll be interesting to see how wisely he uses that.
~ Cribbertarian ~
Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
Originally Posted by John Singleton
To me Boult looks head and shoulders above the rest of the NZ bowlers. Hope he stays fit as he could end up a very very good bowler.
Boult looks much better for mine, Starc is dangerous in shorter formats and on up/down pitches but Boult is far more accurate and gets movement more consistently.
RIP Phillip Hughes (1988-2014)
He's from NZ. No matter the injury history, NZ quicks have a bad end....
TC raises a good point.
Starc's action and body appear more suited to a long career than Boult's. Touch wood, Boult has been pretty good since his almost continuous injuries from 2008 - 2010. Long may it continue and please don't let this be a jinx.
I don't get it. Boult has a nice easy action and is by all accounts the fittest player in the team.
He's slowly putting on muscle and is not as skinny as he was a couple of years ago.
I see no reason to predict injury.
I actually think him being slight is an advantage. Less stress on his joints. Bigger guys are much more likely to get injured IMO.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)