• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

BoyBrumby migrates to Australia. Develops gadget.

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Shame it's two years from being used in anger, but hopefully this is the beginning of the end of the chucking era.

Hopefully in twenty years kids will view vids of the like of Ajmal or Botha and say "How the feck did they get away with that?!"
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Gadget needs to be patented in the subcontinent or there'll be the inevitable conspiracy theories arising.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
So, if real time results can be produced, would you want every ball over 15 degrees no-balled? Probably the only way it can work, isn't it?
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
So, if real time results can be produced, would you want every ball over 15 degrees no-balled? Probably the only way it can work, isn't it?
If it's that quick (and not analysed at the end of the day), it'd be ideal. Just like overstepping - immediate no ball.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah I reckon that's the way to do it. uvelocity is right though about different ways of measuring throwing - can you pick up hyperextension with just two sensors? Maybe you can, I don't know.

Will be as much of a political football as udrs so we probably won't see it until 2020.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
If it's that quick (and not analysed at the end of the day), it'd be ideal. Just like overstepping - immediate no ball.
I honestly don't think it's going to reach this point for a while. Far too complex for an automated system. It'll be a tool for the match referee/some other official to use and keep tabs on, and warnings etc can be handed out on when he/she thinks the evidence against the "bowler" is damning enough.
 

uvelocity

International Coach
just saw 'the back page' on fox and some of the crap which passed for comment from robert craddock was amazing. you couldn't blame anyone who relied on his analysis for being completely wrong. surely 'Australia's premier cricket writer who has covered the sport for more than 20 years' should have a better idea....

sample 1) "with this device there will never be another murali!"
sample 2) "what they have been doing is in the matches guys do this (makes chucking motion) then they get tested in a lab where they just go woop woop and get cleared (makes bowling action)

all the while billy birmingham (comedian!) is trying to get a word in edgewise regarding the fact that murali can't straighten his arm!
 

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
Hopefully this clears players we have permanently bent arms, but aren't doing any addition flexing. Bowlers aren't judged by the 2-D perception of their actions.

Though I'm sure when science clears these bowlers again, people will always complain if they look like their are visually throwing. It will be a never ending argument. Science over physical appearance.
 

jan

State Vice-Captain
...
sample 1) "with this device there will never be another murali!"
sample 2) "what they have been doing is in the matches guys do this (makes chucking motion) then they get tested in a lab where they just go woop woop and get cleared (makes bowling action)
...
ad 1. great news
ad 2. good observation by cpt. obvious
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Just to take issue with the whole "it's 2D, you can't tell" thing: if anyone really believes dodgy looking actions somehow appear better when viewed in three dimensions then they clearly don't watch enough live cricket.
 

Top