Cricket Web

Cricket Web (http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/)
-   Cricket Chat (http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/cricket-chat/)
-   -   Clarke retains T20 captaincy (http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/cricket-chat/46867-clarke-retains-t20-captaincy.html)

Jakester1288 23-05-2010 10:34 PM

Clarke retains T20 captaincy
 
Michael Clarke retains Australia's Twenty20 captaincy | Cricket News | England v Australia 2010 | Cricinfo.com

Give it to White, TBH.

Not complaining about Clarke gaining experience though, if I gave a stuff about Twenty20 I'd be raging though.

Spark 23-05-2010 11:22 PM

Can't say I'm overly shocked.

Athlai 24-05-2010 12:03 AM

T20 matches don't mean much outside of the WC and domestic stuff.

Jayzamann 24-05-2010 12:24 AM

Disappointed to see, but CA have an agenda with giving Clarke as much international captaincy as possible. But really, t20i is so helter skelter and dynamic, incumbency really shouldn't matter as much in this format as in tests. Form players should be given precedent.

That being said, aside from Clarke and Haddin, that squad is super duper. It would be interesting to see how the Saffers experiment with ABdeV works out, and whether it would be applicable to Australia in one way or another.

Matt79 24-05-2010 02:08 AM

There's not really a AB equivalent who demands selection as a batsman and can also keep a bit. Haddin is the best batsman-keeper we have.

TumTum 24-05-2010 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt79 (Post 2228674)
There's not really a AB equivalent who demands selection as a batsman and can also keep a bit. Haddin is the best batsman-keeper we have.

Nah I think Paine is the better T20 batsmen.

Matt79 24-05-2010 02:23 AM

He's the only other candidate worth discussing and again, he's a keeper who can bat, as opposed to th AB scenario of someone who'd be selected as a batsman anyway.

Imagine with the WC behind us and some major test series coming up, they're keen to give Haddin the nod over Tim in order to give him time to acclimitise in the middle.

Scaly piscine 24-05-2010 11:25 AM

Selectors don't appear to have learnt anything regarding T20.

How they can still pick Clarke and still not pick Bollinger is unbelievable.

pasag 24-05-2010 11:58 AM

It's complicated because we don't know whether this is due to:

a) Selectors being too scared to go against the prodigal son OR
b) Selectors acknowledging he's crap at T20, but they reckon as long as Clarke gets good experience for Tests it's worth it and the end justifies the means OR
c) They still just don't get, buying into the myth and thinking because you're young and have blonde hair you're automatically good at Twenty20. As if only slow scorers look like massive german prison guards.

flibbertyjibber 24-05-2010 12:02 PM

Seems a strange move to me.Then again T20 isn't exactly important and i say that just a week after winning the world title in that format.It was nice at the time but i am looking forward to other matches more than any T20 game.

social 24-05-2010 01:21 PM

Clarke is now officially the first Oz captain of any team for god knows how long who isnt good enough to make the x1

Why?

It's p-o-l-i-t-i-c-s!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Spark 24-05-2010 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Athlai (Post 2228640)
T20 matches don't mean much outside of the WC and domestic stuff.

True this.

age_master 24-05-2010 07:35 PM

I think Clarke did a good job with the captaincy generally.

Shame about his batting though.

Spark 24-05-2010 07:46 PM

Quote:

He didn't quite do that over there but we weren't concerned about it.
>_>

Am I the only one who can't wait for tests to start again so I can, y'know, enjoy watching him bat again?

Shifter 24-05-2010 08:04 PM

I'm not a Clarke fan but I'd like to see him given a chance to improve. There have been some other guys who were pigeonholed as ODI/Test batsmen only who have managed to find success in T20. The world cup might be the wake up call he needed.

Haddin is a strange case for me, as from what I've seen hes a naturally attacking batsman. I would of thought T20 would suit him just fine.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web