• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in South Africa

Matt79

Global Moderator
Siddle has a hot-spot/nascent stress fracture in his foot, doesn't he? Mitch has grabbed at his hammy a couple of times during the last couple of matches - probably has a bit of twinge.
 

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Siddle has a hot-spot/nascent stress fracture in his foot, doesn't he? Mitch has grabbed at his hammy a couple of times during the last couple of matches - probably has a bit of twinge.
Siddle back on now, he looks like he's in a bit of pain but he's giving Kallis a workout so i hope he can bowl for a while.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Not actually able to watch it (following it on ABC radio), but I can imagine :)

Talking now about what the best possible Aussie attack would be, it's easy to say this while we're on top like this, but I actually think they're pretty close to it now. Maybe Clark or a fit/firing Lee for Hilf but he hardly embarrasses himself. I think McDonald adds great balance to a pace attack, and a part time spin combo of North/Clarke would be fine if the track demands it.
I think there's a pretty strong case for picking four specialist seamers in England. Johnson, Lee, Clark and Siddle, with North/Clarke as the spin options. Over rates would be the main negative which would lead to a McDonald or McGain being selected instead of one of them, but if you leave aside the over issues that's definitely the strongest Australian attack available IMO.

The really interesting question might be about who misses out. Hilf would be the obvious one to go first, but if they do want to bring both Clark and Lee back into the side and they're both fit, would they drop Siddle? Big call.
 

Woodster

International Captain
I think there's a pretty strong case for picking four specialist seamers in England. Johnson, Lee, Clark and Siddle, with North/Clarke as the spin options. Over rates would be the main negative which would lead to a McDonald or McGain being selected instead of one of them, but if you leave aside the over issues that's definitely the strongest Australian attack available IMO.

The really interesting question might be about who misses out. Hilf would be the obvious one to go first, but if they do want to bring both Clark and Lee back into the side and they're both fit, would they drop Siddle? Big call.
I would think that Hilfenhaus would prosper to a larger degree than Siddle on English pitches (although what do I know!). He bowls a fuller length and the swing he will get will make him a dangerous bowler. How good a bowler Siddle is may be determined by his ability to alter his length to suit the English conditions.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
I think there's a pretty strong case for picking four specialist seamers in England. Johnson, Lee, Clark and Siddle, with North/Clarke as the spin options. Over rates would be the main negative which would lead to a McDonald or McGain being selected instead of one of them, but if you leave aside the over issues that's definitely the strongest Australian attack available IMO.

The really interesting question might be about who misses out. Hilf would be the obvious one to go first, but if they do want to bring both Clark and Lee back into the side and they're both fit, would they drop Siddle? Big call.
Is Symonds completely out of the question now?
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
So do we even look like getting either of these boys out at the moment? Doesn't sound as though we're causing them any notable problems at all.

BTW - well played JHK.
 
Last edited:

Matt79

Global Moderator
Yes, IMO. Strong off field reasons not to pick him, there no longer is any pressing onfield need for him and he's in his mid 30s and playing pus at state level.
 

Evermind

International Debutant
This is going to be a huge morale downer for the Aussies if Kallis and De Villiers both get tons.

C'mon guys! You can do it!!!

It'll be fantastic if they can draw this - and who knows? 5-6 wickets left, well set batsmen, and the last session tomorrow could yield a hundred runs for a win!
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
This is going to be a huge morale downer for the Aussies if Kallis and De Villiers both get tons.

C'mon guys! You can do it!!!

It'll be fantastic if they can draw this - and who knows? 5-6 wickets left, well set batsmen, and the last session tomorrow could yield a hundred runs for a win!
Nah, the new ball will settle it in the first hour tomorrow.
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
I would think that Hilfenhaus would prosper to a larger degree than Siddle on English pitches (although what do I know!). He bowls a fuller length and the swing he will get will make him a dangerous bowler. How good a bowler Siddle is may be determined by his ability to alter his length to suit the English conditions.
****house has bowled too short this innings (also played Kallis in) and his swing is from the hand which makes him pretty 'easy' to read whilst his wicket in this game was with an outswinger which went terribly wrong. Siddle is different class and his length isn't much difference, bowls even fuller for mine.

Although, in saying that House should definitely tour England, better bowler than Bollinger but get Clark in for him and then go with Lee as the reserve test seamer or the 4th if you go with that composition for the Ashes.

Aus, if they wrap things up tomorrow should look into getting a McGain a gig in Cape Town.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
****house has bowled too short this innings (also played Kallis in) and his swing is from the hand which makes him pretty 'easy' to read whilst his wicket in this game was with an outswinger which went terribly wrong. Siddle is different class and his length isn't much difference, bowls even fuller for mine.

Although, in saying that House should definitely tour England, better bowler than Bollinger but get Clark in for him and then go with Lee as the reserve test seamer or the 4th if you go with that composition for the Ashes.

Aus, if they wrap things up tomorrow should look into getting a McGain a gig in Cape Town.
Also known as an "inswinger".
 

pasag

RTDAS
Great stuff from Kallis and de Villiers. Bit frustrating having such a memorable series win within our grasp and not being able to drive it home but at least it's exposing our selection mistakes which can only be a good thing. Negative reinforcement ftw. Still, not too worried, 7 wickets in 90 overs shouldn't be too hard (famous last words?).
 

Langeveldt

Soutie
Daring to dream quietly here, I've been incredibly critical of SA in the last few days and I will see this as a bit of a get out of jail if we can do it. If we manage to bat all day though we will surely be somewhere close to winning the game.. Cue a crippled Smith to hit the winning runs of Johnson, we can but dream.
 

Top