Cricket Betting Site Betway

View Poll Results: Does the Swalec Stadium deserve Test status?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    5 25.00%
  • Yes, but not an Ashes Test just yet

    6 30.00%
  • No

    7 35.00%
  • Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysilio gogogoch

    2 10.00%
Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 219

Thread: Swalec Stadium

  1. #61
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    It doesn't. How poor his poor performances are has absolutely nothing to do with how good his good performances are. Each match is separate. Once someone has done well in one match, that good performance can never, ever be detracted from by anything that happens subsequently or has happened previously.

    Clark has been massively polarised in recent times. Not outstanding, not dreadful. Massively polarised.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  2. #62
    State Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    England (support India)
    Posts
    1,407
    Reckon clark is the bowler's equivalent of a flat track bully, very effective when there's a bit in the surface for him, next to useless on flatties.

  3. #63
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Generally referred to as green-top bullies. Well, not entirely I don't think - he's already demonstrated that he can perform on non-seamers - but it's hardly unusual for a seam-bowler to be far, far better on green wickets than bare ones.

    We'll wait and see how Clark's career pans-out but I've always said that those looking for him to be the next McGrath were asking far too much. I don't think anyone should really doubt that he has plenty to offer in Test cricket though - plenty.

  4. #64
    Request Your Custom Title Now! Uppercut's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    .
    Posts
    29,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    Generally referred to as green-top bullies. Well, not entirely I don't think - he's already demonstrated that he can perform on non-seamers - but it's hardly unusual for a seam-bowler to be far, far better on green wickets than bare ones.

    We'll wait and see how Clark's career pans-out but I've always said that those looking for him to be the next McGrath were asking far too much. I don't think anyone should really doubt that he has plenty to offer in Test cricket though - plenty.
    He's 33, remember. It's a bit strange to be waiting for the career of a 33 year old fast bowler to pan out.


  5. #65
    U19 Vice-Captain rivera213's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    503
    Well, if Clark doesn't have a successful Ashes (in terms of how he bowls, not necessarily how many wickets he gets or Avg etc), then I think CA may look elsewhere- being that he is almost 34 years old.

    Ditto for Brett Lee, though a bit younger.

    Those 2, like Jason Gillespie in 2005 are obviously past their best, injuries are telling their toll and both are well into their 30's.

    Johnson, Hilfenhaus and Siddle seem to be in the long term plans for CA. I don't know how good Bollinger is since I've seen precious little of him. I don't think Watson is free of injury long enough and McDonald is simply not good enough to be the 4th seamer. Tait doesn't seem to be the man for them either.

    Without a Shane Warne at 1 end bowling for long periods and taking wickets, Australia really need a 4th seamer (or 2 spinners of "good" level. Krejza is 1, though he's very expensive and Michael Clarke's back isn't great).
    All-Time Test XI:
    Gavaskar, Boycott, Tendulkar, G.Pollock, V.Richards, Sobers, Gilchrist (wk), Warne (c), Waqar/Wasim, Lillee, Ambrose.

  6. #66
    Hall of Fame Member Son Of Coco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    18,607
    Quote Originally Posted by oitoitoi View Post
    Reckon clark is the bowler's equivalent of a flat track bully, very effective when there's a bit in the surface for him, next to useless on flatties.
    Interesting observation to make after one poor series in India in which he may or may not have been carrying an injury.

    He seems to have been reasonably effective up-to-date.
    R.I.P Craigos, you were a champion bloke. One of the best

    R.I.P Fardin 'Bob' Qayyumi

    Member of the Church of the Holy Glenn McGrath

    "How about you do something contstructive in this forum for once and not fill the forum with ****. You offer nothing." - theegyptian.

    "There's more chance of SoC making a good post than Smith averaging 99.95." - Furball

    "**** you're such a **** poster." - Furball

  7. #67
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Uppercut View Post
    He's 33, remember. It's a bit strange to be waiting for the career of a 33 year old fast bowler to pan out.
    I reckon he's still closer to the start of his career than the end - or, if not, then the amount we've passed the middle point is minimal.

    He was 30 before he made his Test debut.

  8. #68
    State Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    England (support India)
    Posts
    1,407
    L;ook at his record at various grounds, has basically only been poor (very poor to be frank) on the flatter or slower surfaces. Conversely he's been very effective on grounds with a bit of bounce, basically he's very reliant on conditions.

  9. #69
    State Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    England (support India)
    Posts
    1,407
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    I reckon he's still closer to the start of his career than the end - or, if not, then the amount we've passed the middle point is minimal.

    He was 30 before he made his Test debut.
    Another year or two and he'll be surpassed in the pecking order by the likes of Hilfenhaus and Bollinger, he's not particularly sharp as it is, another 2 years and he'll be even slower.

  10. #70
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by rivera213 View Post
    Well, if Clark doesn't have a successful Ashes (in terms of how he bowls, not necessarily how many wickets he gets or Avg etc), then I think CA may look elsewhere- being that he is almost 34 years old.

    Ditto for Brett Lee, though a bit younger.

    Those 2, like Jason Gillespie in 2005 are obviously past their best, injuries are telling their toll and both are well into their 30's.
    Gillespie was only 30 in 2005 - he just seemed older because a) he started very young and b) he bowled so utterly diabolically and c) he ended-up being pensioned-off thereafter.

    Clark also has shown no signs of decline - as Gillespie didn't really. He was poor in NZ in 2004/05 - how poor I don't know as I didn't have access to the series - but no-one could possibly have imagined he'd be so utterly dreadful as he was in England. Came completely out of nowhere. He'd been as good as ever up to the end of the home summer of 2004/05.

    I can't see Clark having such a steep, instant decline, purely because virtually no-one ever does. Cases like Gillespie's are extraordinary rule-exceptions.

  11. #71
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by oitoitoi View Post
    Another year or two and he'll be surpassed in the pecking order by the likes of Hilfenhaus and Bollinger, he's not particularly sharp as it is, another 2 years and he'll be even slower.
    That depends on Hilfenhaus and Bollinger being any good - Hilfenhaus certainly has promise but I've never thought that much of Bollinger TBH. Also, while Hilfenhaus is relatively young he's not a rank spring chicken - 26 now. Bollinger, meanwhile, is getting on himself - 28 in a few months' time. Seamers like him cannot expect to be bowling well much beyond 30.

  12. #72
    International Vice-Captain Noble One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,340
    Nevermind the challenge of Bollinger and Hilfenhaus. Watch out for Clink McKay in two years time.

  13. #73
    U19 Vice-Captain rivera213's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    503
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    Gillespie was only 30 in 2005 - he just seemed older because a) he started very young and b) he bowled so utterly diabolically and c) he ended-up being pensioned-off thereafter.

    Clark also has shown no signs of decline - as Gillespie didn't really. He was poor in NZ in 2004/05 - how poor I don't know as I didn't have access to the series - but no-one could possibly have imagined he'd be so utterly dreadful as he was in England. Came completely out of nowhere. He'd been as good as ever up to the end of the home summer of 2004/05.

    I can't see Clark having such a steep, instant decline, purely because virtually no-one ever does. Cases like Gillespie's are extraordinary rule-exceptions.
    Gillespie, although his stats aren't bad from the 2004/05 season didn't bowl well through both New Zealand series and the Pakistan series.

    It didn't come as any surprise to me that he was so poor in 2005 tbh.

    He was very good in India then it seemed as soon as he went back to Australia (only 2 weeks after or something ridiculous) he turned into a mediocre bowler. I don't know what happened in those 2 weeks, maybe he got a bad injury in training which he hid from the other players but it was insane how it happened.

    Clark is already on the decline IMO. Not entirely his fault because it looked like he was carrying an injury (how serious I don't know) throughout last season. But that's part of the problem. Getting an injury at 34 is normally very bad news. Not many bowlers (or sportsmen in general) who are injured in their 30's come back well at all.

    The same for Brett Lee. It'll be interesting to see how both go in the Ashes, I am not optimistic at all.

  14. #74
    U19 Vice-Captain rivera213's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    503
    Quote Originally Posted by Noble One View Post
    Nevermind the challenge of Bollinger and Hilfenhaus. Watch out for Clink McKay in two years time.
    This guy presumably: Cricinfo - Players and Officials - Clint McKay

    2 years time would make him 28, although there are late straters, given the fact Australia aren't blessed in the seam bowling department, I think he'd be in consideration now if he was at that level unless they're seeing if Clark and Lee are both finished before slotting him in?

    What's the buzz in Australia, is he being earmarked for the 2010/11 Ashes?

    I think 1 of the 2 (Boll and Hilf) you mentioned will be part of the Aussie attack (probably Hilfenhaus since he seems to be more in favour) for 10/11.

  15. #75
    RTDAS pasag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Looking for milksteak
    Posts
    31,678
    Everyone was writing Lee off after his pre-WC injury and then he had one of his best summers ever vs SL and India. Still remember the vicious articles calling for his head (for Tait of all people iirc).

    After dealing with much better batsmen in SA, I'm pretty confident our attack will be able to do the business against a lesser lineup, although the flat pitches may present a bit of a problem.
    Rest In Peace Craigos
    2003-2012

Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Can you beat for the cricket guru title?
    By Pratters in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 7351
    Last Post: 30-07-2019, 09:45 AM
  2. ***Official*** IPL match discussion thread
    By silentstriker in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 3030
    Last Post: 22-12-2008, 10:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •