Cricket Web Logo
Cricket Coach 2014 - Order Now
Cricket Web Logo
Australia Bangladesh Bermuda Canada England India Ireland Kenya Netherlands New Zealand Pakistan Scotland South Africa Sri Lanka West Indies Zimbabwe
 
Ask the Spider: Ask The Spider #123
Leave a comment »

Q: And right-armers?

A :Curiously, this has gone in the complete opposite direction. Until the 1950s no right-arm fingerspinner had enjoyed a Test career of any remote length. Billy Bates was undoubtedly the first of the Test era, and was most unfortunate to have his career cut short by injury as it was at 15 Tests in the 1880s (all in Australia), in which he took 50 wickets at 16.42. The late-flowering Cec Parkin (10), Vallance Jupp and Tom Goddard (8 each) all had brief careers at the top level in the 1920s and 1930s. Jim Laker, who appeared in a bit-part capacity in the late 1940s, initially showed no sign of breaking the mould. But Laker broke through in 1951, and from there to his retirement in 1958/59 broke ground which no English right-arm fingerspinner had ever attained before. Laker took 144 wickets at 18.97 in the 33 Tests he played against serious opposition in that time, and had he not missed so many games would almost certainly have set records which may never have been broken. Roy Tattersall, a direct contemporary of Laker, played briefly for England in the early 1950s, his 58 wickets in 16 Tests at 26.08 marking him out as unfortunate not to appear more. Laker and Tattersall typified a common trend in cricket - after seemingly eternal droughts, rivers suddenly beginning to flow. Fred Titmus, a fine all-round cricketer, was a contemporary of another, Raymond Illingworth, and an excellent specialist fingerspinner David Allen, yet all three enjoyed plentiful Test careers. Titmus played 47 times between 1962 and 1968 (before a sickening accident in the Caribbean appeared to have ended his career); Illingworth 29 between 1959 and 1968; and Allen 39 between 1960 and 1966. None enjoyed remarkable success: Titmus 145 wickets at 30.82; Illingworth 68 at 28.14; and Allen 122 at 30.97. Illingworth went on to captain the side between 1969 and 1973, and even though he enjoyed less success as a bowler in that time his captaincy was highly praised. After these three came another short drought: Pat Pocock's was an unproductive, bit-part career between 1968 and 1976 (17 Tests, 47 wickets at 43.04). Geoff Miller, now the England National Selector, played the greater part of his Test career during the Packer schism (outside it he appeared 14 times for 22 wickets at 39.90). For a relatively brief time John Emburey was a successful bowler, even though he wasted some of his best years by electing for a Rebel tour to South Africa and taking a three-year ban. But (after playing a little during the Packer schism) he still played 25 Tests between 1981 and mid-1986, taking 68 wickets at 31.85, with almost all of his cricket coming against the best side around, West Indies, England's biggest foes Australia and the powerful Indian batting. Emburey's later Tests produced far less success - from midway through 1986 to 1989 (when he elected for another Rebel tour and appeared to have brought his career to an end) he played 29 more Tests and took a mere 52 wickets at 49.86. He received three further recalls, all rather unexpected, and enjoyed even less success. Eddie Hemmings, who like Miller had appeared briefly during Emburey's first ban, played three times in 1987/88 as a first-choice then came to the fore once again when Emburey was banned again. All in all, Hemmings appeared 16 times at Test level for 43 wickets at 42.44. Peter Such, who was a late developer, played 8 Tests in 1993 and 1994, then reappeared briefly in 1998/99 and 1999, ending-up with 37 wickets at 33.56. Robert Croft was something of a paradox in that like Giles he played often when he should not have done but several times missed prime opportunities to run amok thanks to having been dropped - he ended with an unremarkable 49 Test wickets at 37.24 between 1996 and 2001. Graeme Swann, however, looks as though he has the ability to set himself out as one of if not the finest right-arm fingerspinners England have ever produced. He will never match Laker's feats, as the uncovered wickets of Laker's day are a thing of the distant past, but already in his 20 Tests (this excludes 4 against Bangladesh) he has taken 91 wickets at 26.23, showing himself capable of extracting vicious turn from favourable decks and even a little from unfavourable ones. Whether, like Emburey, he eventually fades away, or whether he goes from strength to strength remains to be seen.
Q: How many times have England actually won Ashes series' in Australia?

A: The inaugural Ashes series is generally accepted to be a three-Test series in 1882/83 - the legend was born after the 1882 Test which England lost and which the Sporting Times printed its famous "obituary of English cricket". The tour of 1882/83, even though nominally a private venture like several previous ones, was said to be a mission to "recover the ashes". Thus, the team was to some extent representing England for the first time. That 1882/83 series, scheduled for three matches, was won, though the Australians immediately, demanded, got and won a fourth game, which is inscribed in official records as a separate match. For the rest of the 19th-century England dominated, including victory in five of the seven Ashes contests (one of which was a one-off Test) in Australia. But after Australia's victory in 1897/98, England victories in Ashes in Australia have become collector's items. In fact there have been just 8, and a few come with *s and +s. Only 1903/04, 1911/12, 1928/29, 1954/55 and 1970/71 can be claimed to be genuinely fine England sides outplaying Australia with conventionally good cricket. 1932/33 of course needs no explanation - extraordinary, if very well-conceived and well-executed, tactics were used to gain England's only Ashes victory of the Bradman era. The great shame is that with such a fine side England may have been able to win even without the leg-theory tactics. 1978/79 is an Ashes series only nominally - in reality, it was contested by most of England's first-choice team and something somewhere between Australia's second and third XI. And 1986/87 too has to be viewed in the context of an Australian side weakened by Rebel tour bans and an England team which, aside from that series, could win nothing in half a decade. Often, it has been the case that one outstanding bowler has dominated the charts in English victories - in 1903/04 it was the aforementioned left-arm spinner Wilfred Rhodes; in 1954/55, the man who may have been the quickest bowler ever, Frank Tyson; in 1970/71, another ferocious paceman, John Snow. In 1911/12, paceman (and all-rounder par excellence) Frank Foster and mystery man Sydney Barnes destroyed a strong Australian unit almost single-handedly.
Q: And how many of these have been retentions and regains?

A: They will not have the chance to do so in 2010/11, being as England currently are Ashes holders. So 1970/71, which is the last time they regained The Ashes in Australia, will remain the most recent for a while longer yet. 1986/87, 1978/79, 1954/55 and 1928/29 were all occasions where England travelled and firmed-up a tumultuous regain of The Ashes in the previous home series of 1985, 1977, 1953 and 1926 respectively. The extraordinary 1932/33 series was the previous occasion to 1970/71 that they had gone and taken The Ashes off the hosts; and 1911/12 and 1903/04 were both joyous occasions when disappointing home defeats, in 1909 and 1902 respectively, were atoned for.
Bookmark and Share
Comments
Will you be the first to leave a comment?

Leave a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they have been approved.

Name: (required)
Email: (will not be published) (required)
Verification Image: (required)
verification image, type it in the box
Your Comments: (required)
Homepage
Recent Articles
Recent Comments
Amit
I always wondering that how many consucative overs bowled by any team (not individual)in Test and on
Jay morley
Hey spider I'm Henry Morley's grandson and yes he did score 64 off an 8 ball over! Will try upload a
Aslam Taher
But what is Sachin's contribution to indian cricket team as far as winning is concerned. We dont nee
Jan
Hello I am asking the same question as Lily Shin on 21 July 2010, looking forward to replies, Thanks
Mohammad Umair
What is the lowest total defended by a team in ODI and Test?
Lily Shih
Who can tell me what kind of lacquer should be lacquered on the top of an indoor cricket ball ?
Rich
I was presuming the question meant in finite-length Tests - the famous 1930 Sabina Test (only, of co
Tapioca
>> At The Oval in 1987, Pakistan, already one-nil up in the series going into the final match, pile
Archive