Zimbabwe astonished the world with their performance in their nation’s inaugural test in 1992, outplaying an experienced India side and drawing the match easily. How did they manage such a feat?

In a continuing series of articles where we introduce Series Points, a new way of ranking Test players, this time we look at the 1960s.

The atrocities that took place in the City of Mumbai will never be forgotten, but England have now finally received the green light to progress with the Indian tour, and cricket will be doing its utmost to bring a welcome distraction to the nation.

This week we look at the best batting series’ without a hundred; the hundreds and fifties in lowest totals; the tailender who wasn’t required to bat; and plenty else.

Does Andrew Symonds really deserve his spot in the Australian Test Side ahead of Shane Watson at this point of time? I think Watson can consider himself extremely unlucky at the moment, and I’ll tell you why.

Andrew Gale has responded to the questions posed to him by various Cricket Web members and visitors bringing to the surface some interesting bits of information.

This week we look at the most five-fors without a ten-for, those who averaged over 60, the abandoned Tests, the run of no not-outs, and the runs of 90s.

Three English seasons have now passed since live Test cricket was removed completely from free-to-air television. Matters are serious already and will only get worse. It is down to the British government to stop this happening.

This week we look at the those who never hit a Test six, the lone centurions who doubled-up, the longest wait between scoring a century, Warwick Armstrong’s follower, and more

This article is the latest in a series which introduces Series Points, a new ranking method for Test players which directly compares all players together (i.e. batsmen and bowlers as well as fielding ability), whilst also awarding more points to players who performed well against stronger opposition