I recall that over for 18, very well. It was possibly an even worse effort than the 2-24-0.Boswell actually had a fair time of it prior to that humiliation. In the semi-final against Lancashire, he picked up Atherton, Flintoff, Fairbrother and Lloyd in a ten-over spell which cost just 44. In the final, a medley of the occasion, nervous tension, clammy palms and those inexplicable scourges called "the yips" did for him. He played only one more match for Leicestershire, crying off after a single over (which yielded eighteen runs) before losing his burgeoning contract and becoming a teacher.
Well UIMM, Tuffey didn't play for 2 years after said affaire. So not sure it was directly linked to it.No, the over I was thinking about was in an ODI match, the first over of the match. This is when Tuffey was in a controversy over a video tape and he just appeared to lose it.
Actually I think that the public knowing about the incident regarding the tape was a week or so after the ODI and just happened to coincide with his dropping from the side? Also I'm pretty sure the actual incident occured several weeks before the Australia series so I don't think the two are necessarily related.No. I remember the ***ual controversy was a big rumour going around. Tuffey was affected, and thus he bowled absolute rubbish, and was never the same bowler again.
vs Sri Lanka in 2001 (funnily enough he didn't play another international):Didn't Andrew Penn bowl a shocking over once?